BMW Z8 E52 4.9 400HP manual vs Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual

BMW Z8 E52 4.9 400HP manual

Source: Toni V Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic

21 reasons for

BMW Z8 E52, model available from 2000 to 2003.
It has 4.9 400HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2003.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Toyota Celica VII, model available from 1999 to 2006.
It has 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2006.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual

21 reasons for BMW Z8 E52 4.9 400KM manual in comparison to Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual

Reasons for

Maximal power

400 > 192 hp
The BMW Z8 E52 4.9 400HP manual is considerably swifter in relation to the BMW Z8 E52 because it has by o 108 percent higher horsepower. The characteristic of this vehicle offers you a good deal more fun of travelling this vehicle.

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

4.7 > 7.4 s
If a fast driving is what you enjoy, the BMW is better for you as it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 37 percent better in relation to the Toyota Celica VII.

Top speed

250 > 225 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​BMW Z8 E52 is greater than the Toyota Celica VII by 25 km/h, which allows the BMW to cover quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 25 kilometers/hour is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.


1,830 > 1,731 mm
Width of a vehicle affects room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The width of the BMW Z8 E52 is larger by 99 mm in comparison to the Toyota and is not really relevant. The medium for the „S” class amounts to 1,791 millimeters and is by 2 percent larger than the same attribute of the BMW.

Fuel tank

72 > 56 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the BMW Z8 E52 that can hold 16 l more fuel compared with the Toyota Celica VII. The medium fuel tank capacity in the S class, from which the BMW Z8 E52 4.9 400HP manual comes from, amounts to 68 liters, whereas in S segment (represented by the Toyota) it amounts to 68 liters.


8 > 4

Engine capacity

4,940 > 1,796 cc
Undoubtedly the BMW wins in the category of {engine capacity. The difference amounts to 3,144 cubic centimeters in relation to engine of the Toyota. It is interesting that in „S” segment, from which the BMW comes from, the average cubic capacity is 3,105 cc and the biggest engine capacity in this class amounts to 8,269 .


4,400 > 4,330 mm
The BMW Z8 E52 is 70 mm longer in relation to the Toyota. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The BMW preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the BMW Z8 E52 will be better driven but the Toyota will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length .

Rear track

1,567 > 1,480 mm

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a improved version of a In-line engine which according to us is with more adventages. Engine of V type installed in a vehicle the BMW Z8 E52 4.9 400HP manual gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may house more cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Smooth engine work and thrilling sound is to a Vee engine’s advantage.

Price range

luxury > popular

Model release date

2000 > 1999
Because of the fact that the Toyota Celica VII was introduced only 1 year prior to the BMW, the gap between technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the BMW Z8 E52 4.9 400HP manual might feature slightly more advanced solutions applied in it.


1,317 > 1,305 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the BMW Z8 E52, which is by 12 mm higher than the Toyota Celica VII, is appropriate choice for you. However, presented cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.

Tire width

275 > 205 mm

Maximal power RPM

6,600 > 7,800 revolutions/minute


1,895 > 1,560 kg

Front track

1,553 > 1,490 mm


32 > 16

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″

Tire profile

40 > 50 %

Curb weight

1,656 > 1,214 kg


9 reasons for Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192KM manual in comparison to BMW Z8 E52 4.9 400HP manual

Reasons for

Average consumption

8.4 > 14.3 l
The Toyota uses 5.9 l less amount of fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the BMW Z8 E52. The difference in the amount of 41 percent will be perceptible in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long term it would allow you to make a real savings.

Urban consumption

11.5 > 21.4 l
The Toyota uses 9.9 l less fuel in the city compared with the BMW Z8 E52 4.9 400HP manual. The difference at the level of 9.9 l is quite significant in everyday use of vehicle. Additionally, within several years it may bring huge savings. Also note that medium results of the average fuel efficiency might be considerably lifted if you drive swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles selected by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.

Trunk capacity

367 > 202 l
The trunk of the Toyota Celica VII is 165 liters bigger in relation to the BMW. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Toyota will be much more handy. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can hold.


655 > 503 km


2,600 > 2,496 mm
Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual has 104 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to the BMW. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.

Urban range

478 > 344 km

Maximum load capacity

350 > 240 kg

Number of seats

4 > 2

End of model sale

2006 > 2003

Cars specifications

BMW Z8 E52 4.9 400HP manual Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2000 1999
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 1,895 kg 1,560 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK