Buick Rainier 4.2 i 295HP vs Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4

Buick Rainier 4.2 i 295HP

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

10 reasons for

Buick Rainier, model available from 2004 to 2007.
It has 4.2 i 295HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2007.
Drive has manual gearbox.

1 reason for

Mazda Tribute I, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4
Buick

10 reasons for Buick Rainier 4.2 i 295KM in comparison to Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

295 > 124 hp
The Buick Rainier has 138 % more horsepower in relation to Mazda Tribute I. The Buick Rainier will be distinctly more dynamically speed up owing to bigger power. Also overtaking other cars while driving should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with stronger motor.
22

Width

1,915 > 1,795 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The width of the Buick Rainier is larger by 120 millimeters in comparison to the Mazda Tribute I and is not really worth considering. The average for the „full-size SUV” class equals to around 1,866 mm and is by 3 percent smaller than the width of the Buick Rainier 4.2 i 295HP.
19

Fuel tank

83 > 57 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Buick Rainier 4.2 i 295HP which can contain 26 l more fuel than the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4. The average fuel tank capacity in the full-size SUV class, from which the Buick Rainier comes from, amounts to 84 liters, whereas in large off-road 4x4 class (represented by the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4) it is 84 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,872 > 2,622 mm
Buick Rainier 4.2 i 295HP has 10 percent longer wheelbase when compared to the Mazda Tribute I. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
6

Length

4,912 > 4,395 mm
The Buick Rainier is 517 mm longer in comparison to the Mazda Tribute I. Long vehicles more of passenger space and usually provide bigger trunk. While the Buick seems to be better choice for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mazda may appeal to the young as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,574 > 1,550 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2004 > 2000
Given that the Mazda was unveiled only 4 years prior to the Buick Rainier 4.2 i 295HP, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Buick Rainier might have a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,825 > 1,710 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference of 7 percent in favor of the Buick Rainier is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Front track

1,600 > 1,553 mm

Mazda

1 reason for Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Buick Rainier 4.2 i 295HP

Reasons for
9

Ground clearance

200 > 198 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the gap between the vehicle body and the ground. As for these two cars, it is the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 that has 1 % higher ground clearance in comparison to the Buick Rainier. This is why the Mazda Tribute I will cope better with dirt roads and high curbs in the city. One drawback is the higher ground clearance means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively affect the handling of the vehicle.

Cars specifications

Buick Rainier 4.2 i 295HP Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 1,986 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK