Cadillac CTS I 2.6 i V6 24V 185HP manual vs Peugeot 607 2.2 HDi 133HP automatic

Cadillac CTS I 2.6 i V6 24V 185HP manual

Source: Rblimas All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Cadillac CTS I, model available from 2002 to 2007.
It has 2.6 i V6 24V 185HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2005.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Peugeot 607, model available from 2000.
It has 2.2 HDi 133HP ic diesel engine produced from 2000.
Drive on the front axle has automatic gearbox.

Peugeot 607 2.2 HDi 133HP automatic

12 reasons for Cadillac CTS I 2.6 i V6 24V 185KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 607 2.2 HDi 133HP automatic

Reasons for

Maximal power

185 > 133 hp
The Cadillac CTS I has 39 percent more horsepower in comparison to Peugeot 607 2.2 HDi 133HP automatic. The Cadillac will be distinctly quicker speed up thanks to bigger power. Also leaving behind obstacles like TIRs or buses should be much more easier for a car equipped with stronger engine.

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.3 > 12.1 s
The Peugeot speeds up relatively slower than the Cadillac CTS I. The difference in the amount of 2.8 s is is slightly to the Cadillac advantage, however, it should not be strongly taken into as important for choosing one of compared vehicles.

Top speed

223 > 202 km/h
The top speed of the Cadillac is greater in comparison to this of the Peugeot 607 which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 10 percent is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.


2,883 > 2,795 mm
The Cadillac CTS I 2.6 i V6 24V 185HP manual has 3 percent longer wheelbase than Peugeot 607 2.2 HDi 133HP automatic. Thanks to this the Cadillac CTS I 2.6 i V6 24V 185HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.


6 > 4

Engine capacity

2,596 > 2,180 cc
The Cadillac CTS I has 416 cc larger engine capacity than the Peugeot. As the difference is small, the Cadillac CTS I should accelerate only a bit faster, if other paramerters are equal.

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a developed version of a In-line engine which as far as we are concerned is wiser to choose one. Engine of V characteristic installed inside a vehicle the Cadillac CTS I gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor may contain high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Better engine work and pleasant sound is to driving fans certainly to a Vee engine’s advantage.

Price range

luxury > popular

Model release date

2002 > 2000
Given that the Peugeot was launched only 2 years prior to the Cadillac CTS I, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Cadillac might feature a bit more modern solutions applied in it.

Tire width

225 > 215 mm


24 > 16

Tire profile

55 > 60 %


9 reasons for Peugeot 607 2.2 HDi 133KM automat in comparison to Cadillac CTS I 2.6 i V6 24V 185HP manual

Reasons for

Urban consumption

9.8 > 13.6 l
The fuel economy (urban) is distinctly to the Peugeot 607 2.2 HDi 133HP automatic's advantage. This car consumes 28 percent less fuel in built up area when compared to the Cadillac CTS I. Better fuel consumption means an increase in cruising range.

Trunk capacity

479 > 362 l
With more trunk space the Peugeot will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional car than the Cadillac. If the capacity of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Peugeot will be better to buy because it is around 117 liters more spacious than the boot of its contender.


1,835 > 1,793 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Peugeot is 42 millimeters wider when compared to the Cadillac CTS I. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.

Fuel tank

81 > 67 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is Peugeot 607 which is able to carry by 14 liters more oil in comparison to the Cadillac.

Urban range

816 > 485 km


4,902 > 4,828 mm
The Peugeot 607 is 74 millimeters longer when compared to the Cadillac CTS I. Long cars more of passenger space and also have more storage space. Although the Peugeot occurs to be better option for families or those who appreciate convenient rides, the Cadillac CTS I may be more appropriate to singles because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.


1,442 > 1,441 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference of 1 millimeter in favor of the Peugeot 607 is insignificant and does not matter much.


automatic > manual
For a gentle drive around town, it is worth to have an automatic however the choice of transmisison may have a considerable impact on fuel consumption. Automatics may burn up about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Cadillac CTS I 2.6 i V6 24V 185HP manual Peugeot 607 2.2 HDi 133HP automatic
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2002 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class E E
    Payload 2,128 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK