The fuel economy (urban) is distinctly to the Peugeot 607 2.2 HDi 133HP automatic's advantage. This car consumes 28 percent less fuel in built up area when compared to the Cadillac CTS I. Better fuel consumption means an increase in cruising range.
With more trunk space the Peugeot will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional car than the Cadillac. If the capacity of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Peugeot will be better to buy because it is around 117 liters more spacious than the boot of its contender.
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Peugeot is 42 millimeters wider when compared to the Cadillac CTS I. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is Peugeot 607 which is able to carry by 14 liters more oil in comparison to the Cadillac.
The Peugeot 607 is 74 millimeters longer when compared to the Cadillac CTS I. Long cars more of passenger space and also have more storage space. Although the Peugeot occurs to be better option for families or those who appreciate convenient rides, the Cadillac CTS I may be more appropriate to singles because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference of 1 millimeter in favor of the Peugeot 607 is insignificant and does not matter much.
For a gentle drive around town, it is worth to have an automatic however the choice of transmisison may have a considerable impact on fuel consumption. Automatics may burn up about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.