The Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4 has by 221 hp bigger amount of horses under the hood compared to the Ford Maverick II. The difference is really big and because of this it greatly affect feeling of riding the car. It may be interesting to know that the Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4 has by 130 hp more horses under the hood compared to the average in class „full-size SUV”.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
If a fast driving is what you are really in to, the Cadillac is better for you because it’s
acceleration to 100 km/h is
better in relation to
The Cadillac Escalade II features 178 liters
compared with the Ford Maverick II.
Such a difference is quite big
so it will is relevant to the comfort of the
car’s usage. It is worth to note that
the Cadillac has
boot size than the average in the
same class. Roomy
trunk will be useful during family
traveling as well as while
daily car’s usage.
The maximum speed of the Cadillac is greater in relation to of the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual by 5, which allows the Cadillac to travel faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 5 percent is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
Width of a vehicle affects room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up is widther only by 226 mm in relation to the Ford Maverick II and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „full-size SUV” class equals to 1,866 millimeters and is by 141 millimeters smaller than the width of the Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4.
With no doubts the winner of this two cars is the Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up which takes by 61 bigger amount of liters of fuel in relation to the Ford. Such a substantial difference results from considerable dissimilarity in both cars engines.
The Cadillac Escalade II has 26 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Ford. The shorter distance between axles, the less time exists for shock absorption by the separate suspension components. Thus the Cadillac with a longer wheelbase should provide the smoothest drive. But, the Ford Maverick II with shorter wheelbases have tighter turning angles and can corner faster than equivalent vehicles having longer wheelbases.
Obviously the Cadillac Escalade II wins the comparison of this category. The difference amounts to 200 percent in relation to engine of the Ford Maverick II. It is interesting that in „large 4x4 ” class, from which the Cadillac comes from, the average engine capacity equals 3,614 cubic centimeters and the biggest engine displacement in this class is 8,128 .
Maximum load capacity
The Ford Maverick II is shorter than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual by o 1,255 mm , which makes that it is much more easier to move and turn in narrow jammed cities. In the „full-size SUV” segment, in which the car of Ford brand is palced, the medium length is 4,713 millimeters and is by 7 % longer than the length of Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual.
A V engine is a
improved construction of a
which in our opinion} is
adventages. Engine of V type
inside a car the Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4
produces more torque at lower RPM ranges due to
the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of
engime can contain more
cylinders without significant growth in its
Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is
to driving fans to a Vee
Model release date
Because of the fact that the Ford's production started only 2 years before the Cadillac Escalade II, the gap between technology used in both cars is not really huge, however, the Cadillac might have a bit more new solutions applied in it.
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Cadillac Escalade II, which is by 10 % higher than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual, is better pick for you. However, presented cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.