Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

13 reasons for

Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up, model available from 2002 to 2007.
It has 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2007.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

9 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
Cadillac

13 reasons for Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

345 > 170 hp
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 noticeably gives way to the Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4 in the category of amount of horses under the hood having them by 175 hp less. Consequently the engine of the Cadillac ,unlike the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4, produces lots of power and good acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.4 > 12.8 s
If a dynamic driving is what you are keen on, the Cadillac Escalade II fits you better because it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 34 percent faster compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I.
22

Width

2,007 > 1,695 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Cadillac Escalade II is 18 % wider in comparison to the Mitsubishi. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

3,308 > 2,725 mm
The Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4 has 583 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Mitsubishi. Therefore the Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4 is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

5,966 > 2,971 cc
The engine capacity of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I is so much lower ( the difference amounts to 2,995 cubic centimeters in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4, that it have little sense to make the decision which vehicle is worth buying. These cars are so varying that on the basis of information about engine size we can only choose between engine’s performance and car’s economy.
6

Length

5,649 > 4,610 mm
The Cadillac is 23 % longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. Long vehicles more of passenger space and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up occurs to be better for families or persons who value convenient driving, the Mitsubishi may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2002 > 1996
Production of the older vehicle commenced much more earlier than its rival thus it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle features not so modern technologies applied.
1

Height

1,887 > 1,720 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4, which is by 167 millimeters higher than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4, would be appropriate pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

265 > 245 mm
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Curb weight

2,685 > 1,835 kg

Mitsubishi

9 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

17.5 > 19.6 l
The Mitsubishi uses of 11 % gasoline less running around the town compared to the Cadillac. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4, which is classified in large 4x4 class, consumes 2.7 l of fuel for every 100 km more than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “large SUV” class equals to 14.8 l of fuel for every 100 km.
33

Top speed

175 > 174 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 is greater as compared to this of the Cadillac Escalade II which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 1 km/h is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car usually is a hatchback and for that reason the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats enlarging a luggage compartment, has an advantage over the four-door Cadillac Escalade II which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For those who appreciate less absorbing driving a car and don’t want to struggle with complications resulting from the stick shift we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic gearbox. To those who enjoy sporting driving a stick shift may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,200 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2007
0

Valves

24 > 16

Cars specifications

Cadillac Escalade II Pick Up 6.0 i V8 EXT 345HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2002 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,176 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK