Cadillac Escalade III 6.2 V8 409HP automatic vs Mercury Mariner II 2.3 155HP

Cadillac Escalade III 6.2 V8 409HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released into the public domain

9 reasons for

Cadillac Escalade III, model available from 2007.
It has 6.2 V8 409HP ic petrol engine produced from 2007.
Drive has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

No reasons for

Mercury Mariner II, model available from 2007.
It has 2.3 155HP petrol engine produced from 2007.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mercury Mariner II 2.3 155HP
Cadillac

9 reasons for Cadillac Escalade III 6.2 V8 409KM automat in comparison to Mercury Mariner II 2.3 155HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

409 > 155 hp
The Cadillac Escalade III 6.2 V8 409HP automatic has 164 % more horsepower in comparison to Mercury Mariner II. The Cadillac Escalade III will be distinctly faster speed up because of grater power. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing other vehicles while driving should be much more easier for the Cadillac Escalade III equipped with stronger motor.
22

Width

2,007 > 1,815 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Cadillac Escalade III is 11 % wider in comparison to the Mercury Mariner II 2.3 155HP. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

99 > 78 l
The Mercury Mariner II 2.3 155HP loses with the Cadillac in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Cadillac is able to carry by 21 liters more fuel in comparison to the Mercury Mariner II.
15

Wheelbase

2,943 > 2,621 mm
Cadillac has 12 % longer wheelbase when compared to the Mercury Mariner II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
9

Ground clearance

304 > 208 mm
Ground clearance means the space between the vehicle underbody and the ground. When it comes to the two compared cars, it is the Cadillac Escalade III which has 46 % higher ride height in comparison to the Mercury Mariner II 2.3 155HP. For this reason the Cadillac Escalade III 6.2 V8 409HP automatic will cope better with rough terrain and high curbs in the city. One drawback is the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the car.
6

Length

5,145 > 4,461 mm
The Cadillac is 15 percent longer in comparison to the Mercury. Long cars are more spacious and in most cases have plenty of trunk space. While the Cadillac occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mercury Mariner II may be more appropriate to the young as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,888 > 1,728 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Cadillac Escalade III 6.2 V8 409HP automatic, which is by 9 % higher than the Mercury Mariner II, would be better pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For people who prefer more functional use of a car and who don’t need complications that stems from the manual transmission we recommend cars with automatic gearbox. To those who have a flair for sport driving a manual gearbox may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.

Mercury

No reasons for Mercury Mariner II 2.3 155KM in comparison to Cadillac Escalade III 6.2 V8 409HP automatic


Cars specifications

Cadillac Escalade III 6.2 V8 409HP automatic Mercury Mariner II 2.3 155HP
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2007 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK