Land Rover Discovery III 4.4 i V8 32V 295HP manual 4x4 vs Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4

Land Rover Discovery III 4.4 i V8 32V 295HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Matthias93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic

15 reasons for

Land Rover Discovery III, model available from 2004 to 2009.
It has 4.4 i V8 32V 295HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2009.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

7 reasons for

Cadillac SRX I, model available from 2004 to 2009.
It has 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2009.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4
Land Rover

15 reasons for Land Rover Discovery III 4.4 i V8 32V 295KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

295 > 264 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Land Rover Discovery III that has by 12 % horsepower more in relation to the Cadillac SRX I, which makes this car somewhat faster. Thanks to more horsepower the Land Rover Discovery III 4.4 i V8 32V 295HP manual 4x4 should as well give somewhat more efficiency in specific speeds.
38

Trunk capacity

1,260 > 238 l
The boot of the Land Rover is 1,022 liters larger in relation to the Cadillac SRX I. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Land Rover Discovery III will be much more functional. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can transport.
22

Width

1,912 > 1,849 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Land Rover Discovery III is 3 % wider in relation to the Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

81 > 71 l
The Cadillac is worst that the Land Rover Discovery III 4.4 i V8 32V 295HP manual 4x4 in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Land Rover is able to carry by 14 percent more fuel than its contender.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

4,393 > 3,563 cc
The Land Rover has 23 percent greater engine displacement compared to the Cadillac SRX I. As the difference is little, the Land Rover Discovery III should accelerate only a bit faster, of course assuming that other paramerters are does not play a role.
4

Rear track

1,612 > 1,576 mm
1

Height

1,889 > 1,723 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Land Rover Discovery III, which is by 10 % higher than the Cadillac SRX I, is better choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Tire width

255 > 235 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,606 > 1,571 mm
0

Valves

32 > 24
0

Tire diameter

19 > 17 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

2,531 > 1,959 kg

Cadillac

7 reasons for Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Land Rover Discovery III 4.4 i V8 32V 295HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

11.8 > 14.8 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Cadillac SRX I's advantage. This vehicle consumes 20 % fewer fuel in the combined cycle compared to the Land Rover. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the large SUV class, in which the Cadillac is classified, is 12.2 l whereas the Cadillac SRX I burns up by 4 % less amount of fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

13.8 > 20.7 l
The Cadillac consumes 6.9 l of fuel less in the city in comparison to the Land Rover. The Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4, which comes from large off-road 4x4 segment, consumes 1 liter less gasoline, which constitutes by 7 % better fuel consumption than the average in the same segment. The difference in fuel economy between compared vehicles is quite big, so remember that so as to the comparison have a sense, you should check models with similar parameters.
33

Top speed

210 > 195 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​Cadillac is greater in comparison to the Land Rover Discovery III by 15 kilometers/hour, which allows the Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4 to cover faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 8 percent is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
19

Range

593 > 547 km
15

Wheelbase

2,949 > 2,878 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Cadillac SRX I has 71 mm longer wheelbase distance when compared to Land Rover Discovery III 4.4 i V8 32V 295HP manual 4x4. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4 should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

507 > 392 km
6

Length

4,948 > 4,835 mm
The Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4 is 113 mm longer in relation to the Land Rover Discovery III. Long vehicles more of passenger space and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Cadillac occurs to be better option for families or drivers who love the idea of comfortable driving, the Land Rover Discovery III 4.4 i V8 32V 295HP manual 4x4 may be more appropriate to women as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.

Cars specifications

Land Rover Discovery III 4.4 i V8 32V 295HP manual 4x4 Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury luxury
    Model release date 2004 2004
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,226 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK