Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4 vs Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4

Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Matthias All Rights Released into the public domain

9 reasons for

Cadillac SRX I, model available from 2004 to 2009.
It has 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2009.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

6 reasons for

Suzuki XL7, model available from 2007 to 2009.
It has 3.6 V6 252HP ic petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2009.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4
Cadillac

9 reasons for Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

264 > 252 hp
The horsepower of the Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4 is by 5 % grater than the Suzuki. While the difference is little this should not affect the car performance extensively.
22

Width

1,849 > 1,834 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability during driving. The Cadillac SRX I is widther by 15 millimeters compared with the Suzuki and is not really important. The medium for the „large SUV” segment amounts to 1,866 millimeters and is by 17 mm smaller than the width of the Cadillac SRX I.
19

Fuel tank

71 > 70 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the category of fuel tank size is Cadillac SRX I which is able to take by 1 l more gasoline than the Suzuki XL7.
15

Wheelbase

2,949 > 2,850 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Cadillac SRX I has 3 percent longer wheelbase distance than Suzuki. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4 should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
4

Rear track

1,576 > 1,570 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Front track

1,571 > 1,567 mm
0

Curb weight

1,959 > 1,833 kg

Suzuki

6 reasons for Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
8

Engine capacity

3,565 > 3,563 cc
The Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4 has by 2 cubic centimeters bigger engine capacity than the Cadillac SRX I. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both values does not differ much.
6

Length

5,009 > 4,948 mm
The Suzuki XL7 is 61 millimeters longer in comparison to the Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4. The length of the car is important when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Suzuki XL7 preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4 will be better driven but the Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4 will be a little easier to park because of shorter length .
1

Model release date

2007 > 2004
Because of the fact that the Cadillac was unveiled only 3 years before the Suzuki XL7, the gap between technology used in both cars is not really huge, however, the Suzuki XL7 may feature a bit more new solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,750 > 1,723 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of carrying big amount of stuff to it. The difference that amounts to 27 mm to the advantage of the Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4 is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a drive in the city, it is good to have an automatic but the choice of transmisison may have a considerable impact on fuel economy. Automatics may consume somewhere from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

6,400 > 6,500 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Cadillac SRX I 3.6 i V6 24V 264HP manual 4x4 Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    End of model sale 2009 2009
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK