Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP vs Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4

Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

6 reasons for

Chevrolet Astro I, model available from 1985 to 1994.
It has 2.5 86HP petrol engine produced from 1985 to 1986.
Drive has manual gearbox.

5 reasons for

Honda Odyssey II, model available from 1999 to 2004.
It has 2.3 16V 150HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4
Chevrolet

6 reasons for Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86KM in comparison to Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
22

Width

1,970 > 1,793 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Chevrolet Astro I is larger by 177 millimeters in comparison to the Honda Odyssey II and is not really worth considering. The average for the „van” class is around 1,821 millimeters and is by 149 mm smaller than the width of the Chevrolet.
19

Fuel tank

101 > 66 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank size is Chevrolet Astro I that is able to carry by 35 l more petrol in comparison to the Honda Odyssey II.
8

Engine capacity

2,500 > 2,255 cc
The Chevrolet has 245 cc larger cubic capacity compared to the Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4. As the difference is little, the Chevrolet Astro I should accelerate slightly better, of course if other paramerters are the same.
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A five-door car usually means a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and as a result the Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats giving more space for cargo, has the edge over the 4-door Honda which in turn has a smaller trunk cut off from the passenger compartment.
1

Height

1,935 > 1,632 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP, which is by 303 mm higher than the Honda Odyssey II, is appropriate choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Number of seats

8 > 7

Honda

5 reasons for Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 86 hp
The Honda Odyssey II has 74 % more horsepower in comparison to Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP. The Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 will be distinctly faster accelerate owing to grater power. Also passing cars or obstacles while driving should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with more powerful motor.
15

Wheelbase

2,838 > 2,812 mm
The Honda Odyssey II has 1 percent longer wheelbase when compared to Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP. Therefore the Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
6

Length

4,768 > 4,490 mm
The Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 is 6 percent longer when compared to the Chevrolet. The length of the car is significant when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 will be better driven ,however, the Chevrolet Astro I will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

1999 > 1985
0

End of model sale

2004 > 1994

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1985 1999
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    End of model sale 1994 2004
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK