Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP vs Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP

Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

6 reasons for

Chevrolet Astro I, model available from 1985 to 1994.
It has 2.5 86HP petrol engine produced from 1985 to 1986.
Drive has manual gearbox.

1 reason for

Mitsubishi L300 II, model available from 1985 to 1998.
It has 1.6 80HP petrol engine produced from 1985 to 1990.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP
Chevrolet

6 reasons for Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86KM in comparison to Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

86 > 80 hp
The horsepower of the Chevrolet Astro I is by 8 percent bigger than the Mitsubishi L300 II. Because the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
22

Width

1,970 > 1,690 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Chevrolet is 17 percent wider in relation to the Mitsubishi L300 II. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,812 > 2,243 mm
The Chevrolet has 25 % longer wheelbase in comparison to the Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP. The closer the axles are to one another, the less time exists for shock absorption by the separate suspension components. Thus the Chevrolet Astro I with a longer wheelbase should give the smoothest travel. Hovewer, the Mitsubishi L300 II with shorter wheelbases have tighter turning angles and can corner faster than equivalent cars with long wheelbases.
8

Engine capacity

2,500 > 1,599 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP is by 56 percent greater in relation to the Mitsubishi. As a result the Mitsubishi L300 II will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Chevrolet Astro I will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,490 > 4,290 mm
The Chevrolet Astro I is 200 mm longer when compared to the Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP. The length of the car is important when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Chevrolet Astro I very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP will be better driven ,however, the Mitsubishi L300 II will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
1

Height

1,935 > 1,856 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting big amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 79 millimeters in favor of the Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP is little and should not be really noticeable.

Mitsubishi

1 reason for Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80KM in comparison to Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP

Reasons for
0

End of model sale

1998 > 1994

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Astro I 2.5 86HP Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1985 1985
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    End of model sale 1994 1998

Compare with other cars

By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK