Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V 428HP manual vs Chevrolet Beretta 2.0 90HP manual

Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V 428HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Mutari All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR, model available from 1991 to 1993.
It has 4.9 i V12 48V 428HP petrol engine produced from 1991 to 1993.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Chevrolet Beretta, model available from 1988 to 1996.
It has 2.0 90HP petrol engine produced from 1988 to 1989.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Chevrolet Beretta 2.0 90HP manual
Ferrari

17 reasons for Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V 428KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Beretta 2.0 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

428 > 90 hp
The Chevrolet Beretta significantly loses with the Ferrari in the category of horsepower having them by 338 horsepowers less. As a result the engine installed in the Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V 428HP manual, as opposed to the Chevrolet Beretta, produces relatively lots of power and good acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

5.7 > 13 s
The Ferrari speeds up to 100k\h by 56 percent quicker when compared to the Chevrolet Beretta. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
33

Top speed

290 > 170 km/h
The Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR has by 120 kilometers per hour grater maximum velocity in comparison to the Chevrolet Beretta 2.0 90HP manual, as a result of which a long route, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be drived in much more shorter period of time. The difference may be noticeable during travelling on the road without speed limits.
22

Width

1,979 > 1,724 mm
Width of a vehicle directly influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V 428HP manual is widther only by 15 % than the Chevrolet and is not really important. The medium for the „sports cars” segment amounts to 1,791 millimeters and is by 188 mm smaller than the width of the Ferrari.
19

Range

1,009 > 704 km
19

Fuel tank

115 > 56 l
The Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR features by 59 liters larger fuel tank than the Chevrolet Beretta 2.0 90HP manual. As a result the Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR will travel much more longer distance in one tank, of course assuming that the fuel consumption is equal between these two cars.
14

Cylinders

12 > 4
8

Engine capacity

4,944 > 1,991 cc
The Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR has 148 % bigger cubic capacity when compared to the Chevrolet Beretta. Such a considerable difference causes that comparision of this parameters is pointless. The Chevrolet Beretta 2.0 90HP manual seems to be the right choice for those who apreciate lower fuel consumption and owning costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, drivers the Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V 428HP manual would benefit from better power, durability, smoothness of the car and as a consequence better joy when driving.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A Vee engine is a developed version of a straight engine which according to us is wiser to choose one. Engine of V characteristic installed in a car the Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may house high numbers of cylinders in a smaller package. A Better engine work and nicer sound is to driving fans certainly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
3

Price range

supersport > popular
1

Model release date

1991 > 1988
Because of the fact that the Chevrolet Beretta started to be manufactured only 3 years prior to the Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V 428HP manual might feature a bit more new solutions applied in it.
1

Tire width

255 > 195 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

48 > 8
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Tire profile

50 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,695 > 1,183 kg

Chevrolet

7 reasons for Chevrolet Beretta 2.0 90KM manual in comparison to Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V 428HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.1 > 11.3 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Chevrolet Beretta's advantage. This vehicle consumes 28 percent less gasoline in the mixed cycle than the Ferrari. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the sports cars segment, in which the Chevrolet Beretta is classified, equals to 9.7 l whereas the Chevrolet burns up by 16 % less amount of fuel than the average.
15

Wheelbase

2,616 > 2,544 mm
The Chevrolet has 72 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR. Therefore the Chevrolet Beretta 2.0 90HP manual is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
6

Length

4,757 > 4,477 mm
The Chevrolet Beretta is 6 percent longer when compared to the Ferrari. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also have more storage space. Although the Chevrolet Beretta seems to be better for families or persons who appreciate convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Height

1,347 > 1,135 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 19 % to the advantage of the Chevrolet Beretta 2.0 90HP manual is not big and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 6,300 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 2
0

End of model sale

1996 > 1993

Cars specifications

Ferrari Testarossa 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V 428HP manual Chevrolet Beretta 2.0 90HP manual
    Price range supersport popular
    Model release date 1991 1988
    Facelifting no no
    Code name 512 TR -
    Class S S
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK