Chevrolet Blazer II 2.2 118HP vs Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Chevrolet Blazer II 2.2 118HP

Source: wikipedia.org Milhouse35 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic

6 reasons for

Chevrolet Blazer II, model available from 1995 to 2005.
It has 2.2 118HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 1998.
Drive has manual gearbox.

3 reasons for

Mercury Mariner I, model available from 2005 to 2007.
It has 2.3 155HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2007.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP
Chevrolet

6 reasons for Chevrolet Blazer II 2.2 118KM in comparison to Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

845 > 829 l
The boot of the Chevrolet Blazer II is only 16 liters bigger than the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP. However, the difference is not big it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar boot size.
22

Width

1,895 > 1,790 mm
Distance between two sides of a car affects interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The Chevrolet Blazer II is widther only by 6 percent in comparison to the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „full-size SUV” class amounts to 1,866 mm and is by 29 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Chevrolet Blazer II.
19

Fuel tank

67 > 62 l
The Mercury loses with the Chevrolet Blazer II 2.2 118HP in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Chevrolet Blazer II is able to take by 5 liters more fuel in comparison to its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,863 > 2,627 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Chevrolet Blazer II has 9 percent longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Mercury Mariner I. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Chevrolet Blazer II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
6

Length

4,877 > 4,428 mm
The Chevrolet Blazer II is 449 millimeters longer than the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP. Long cars have more interior space and usually provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Chevrolet seems to be better for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Mercury Mariner I may be more appropriate to women as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
1

Height

1,893 > 1,730 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Chevrolet, which is by 9 % higher than the Mercury, is appropriate pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.

Mercury

3 reasons for Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155KM in comparison to Chevrolet Blazer II 2.2 118HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

155 > 118 hp
The Mercury Mariner I has by 31 percent more horsepower in comparison to Chevrolet Blazer II. The Mercury will be distinctly more dynamically accelerate owing to grater horsepower. Also getting ahead of other cars should be a piece of cake for the Mercury Mariner I equipped with more powerful engine.
1

Model release date

2005 > 1995
Production of the older vehicle began 10 years prior to its competitor and for this reason it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle is equipped with not so modern technologies used.
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2005

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Blazer II 2.2 118HP Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1995 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    End of model sale 2005 2007
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK