The boot of the Chevrolet Blazer II is only 16 liters bigger than the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP. However, the difference is not big it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar boot size.
Distance between two sides of a car affects interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The Chevrolet Blazer II is widther only by 6 percent in comparison to the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „full-size SUV” class amounts to 1,866 mm and is by 29 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Chevrolet Blazer II.
The Mercury loses with the Chevrolet Blazer II 2.2 118HP in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Chevrolet Blazer II is able to take by 5 liters more fuel in comparison to its competitor.
The wheelbase of a car is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Chevrolet Blazer II has 9 percent longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Mercury Mariner I. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Chevrolet Blazer II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
The Chevrolet Blazer II is 449 millimeters longer than the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP. Long cars have more interior space and usually provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Chevrolet seems to be better for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Mercury Mariner I may be more appropriate to women as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Chevrolet, which is by 9 % higher than the Mercury, is appropriate pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.