Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual vs Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic

Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Mr.choppers Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

6 reasons for

Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio, model available from 2006.
It has 6.0 400HP petrol engine produced from 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

5 reasons for

Jaguar XK II Cabrio, model available from 2006.
It has 4.2 300HP ic petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic
Chevrolet

6 reasons for Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400KM manual in comparison to Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

400 > 300 hp
The Chevrolet Camaro V is equipped with petrol which produce by 33 percent more horsepower than the the engine of the Jaguar, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It seems to be better car for drivers who would like to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
22

Width

1,920 > 1,892 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability while driving. The Chevrolet is widther by 1 percent in comparison to the Jaguar and is not really worth considering. The average for the ā€žSā€ segment is around 1,791 millimeters and is by 129 mm larger than the width of the Chevrolet Camaro V.
15

Wheelbase

2,845 > 2,752 mm
Chevrolet has 93 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Jaguar. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Engine capacity

5,970 > 4,197 cc
The Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual has 1,773 cubic centimeters larger engine capacity when compared to the Jaguar. The difference is relatively big. As a result the Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand bigger cubic capacity usually results in worst fuel economy.
6

Length

4,837 > 4,791 mm
The Chevrolet Camaro V is 46 millimeters longer in relation to the Jaguar. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Chevrolet Camaro V probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio will be better driven but the Jaguar will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
1

Height

1,389 > 1,330 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Chevrolet, which is by 4 % higher than the Jaguar XK II Cabrio, is better pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.

Jaguar

5 reasons for Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300KM automat in comparison to Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual

Reasons for
19

Fuel tank

72 > 71 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is Jaguar which can take by 1 l more gasoline in comparison to the Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic transmission which is in the Jaguar XK II despite having a few disadvantages gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city you probably would be more rested. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

32 > 16

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2006 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload - 2,037 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK