Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual vs MG TF II Cabrio 1.6 136HP

Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Mr.choppers Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

6 reasons for

Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio, model available from 2006.
It has 6.0 400HP petrol engine produced from 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

1 reason for

MG TF II Cabrio, model available from 2007.
It has 1.6 136HP petrol engine produced from 2007.
Drive has manual gearbox.

MG TF II Cabrio 1.6 136HP
Chevrolet

6 reasons for Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400KM manual in comparison to MG TF II Cabrio 1.6 136HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

400 > 136 hp
The Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual is distinctly faster when compared to the Chevrolet Camaro V as it has by o 194 percent bigger horsepower. The acceleration of this car offers you more joy of driving this car.
22

Width

1,920 > 1,635 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Chevrolet Camaro V is 17 % wider when compared to the MG TF II Cabrio. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

71 > 50 l
In this category it is the Chevrolet which can contain 21 l more fuel compared with the MG. The medium fuel tank size in the sports cars segment, from which the Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual comes from, is 68 liters, whereas in S class (represented by the MG TF II) it is 68 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,845 > 2,390 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Chevrolet has 19 percent longer wheelbase distance than MG TF II Cabrio 1.6 136HP. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Chevrolet should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
6

Length

4,837 > 3,943 mm
The Chevrolet Camaro V is 23 % longer than the MG. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual probably will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual will be better driven ,however, the MG TF II Cabrio will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
1

Height

1,389 > 1,258 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio, which is by 10 percent higher than the MG TF II Cabrio, is appropriate choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.

MG

1 reason for MG TF II Cabrio 1.6 136KM in comparison to Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual

Reasons for
1

Model release date

2007 > 2006
Because of the fact that the Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio debuted only 1 year earlier than the MG TF II Cabrio, the gap between technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the MG might feature slightly more new solutions applied in it.

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Camaro V Cabrio 6.0 400HP manual MG TF II Cabrio 1.6 136HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK