Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual vs Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

14 reasons for

Chevrolet Captiva I, model available from 2006 to 2010.
It has 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

13 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee V, model available from 2014.
It has 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP ic petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4
Chevrolet

14 reasons for Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141KM manual in comparison to Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.1 > 10 l
The Chevrolet consumes 9 % less fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4. The Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual, which is classified in „compact SUV” segment burns up by 1.6 l more of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

12.5 > 13.9 l
The Chevrolet uses 10 percent fewer in city traffic in relation to the Jeep Cherokee V. The difference in the amount of 10 percent is not realy noticeable in daily usage of the vehicle, however, during the period of a several months it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,005 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is produced determines an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is worth to check a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

7 > 7.7 l
19

Range

714 > 600 km
19

Fuel tank

64 > 61 l
The Jeep Cherokee V loses with the Chevrolet in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Chevrolet is able to carry by 5 % more fuel compared with its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,709 > 2,698 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Chevrolet Captiva I has 11 mm longer wheelbase distance when compared to Jeep. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Chevrolet Captiva I should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

520 > 432 km
11

Extra-urban range

929 > 779 km
8

Maximum load capacity

610 > 399 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 12

Jeep

13 reasons for Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

272 > 141 hp
The Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is equipped with petrol which produce by 131 more horsepower over the Chevrolet, giving the vehicle a much more dynamic character. It should be better car to those who would like to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

317 > 212 Nm
Due to 105 Nm higher torque, the engine of the Jeep distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Chevrolet. This, in turn, have relevant effects on a car's acceleration.
33

Top speed

180 > 175 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is higher in comparison to this of the Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 5 kilometers per hour is not big and is imperceptible in daily use.
22

Width

1,862 > 1,853 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Jeep Cherokee V is 9 mm wider in relation to the Chevrolet Captiva I. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

3,240 > 2,405 cc
The Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 has 835 cubic centimeters larger engine size when compared to the Chevrolet Captiva I. The difference is relatively large. Consequently the Jeep should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine size usually equals worst fuel economy.
6

Length

5,621 > 4,640 mm
The Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is 21 percent longer in relation to the Chevrolet Captiva I. Long cars are more spacious and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 seems to be better for families or drivers who value comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual may be more appropriate to women as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,581 > 1,572 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A Vee engine is a upgraded version of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which according to us is with more adventages. Engine of V type installed inside a vehicle the Jeep gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can house more cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and thrilling sound is to driving fans undoubtedly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Model release date

2014 > 2006
Production of the older car began 8 years prior to its contender hence it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle features not so advanced solutions used.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
To those who value more convenient use of a vehicle and don’t want to struggle with complications that stems from the manual transmission we recommend vehicles with automatic transmission. For those who enjoy sporting driving a stick shift may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Payload

2,432 > 2,158 kg
0

Front track

1,589 > 1,563 mm

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,158 kg 2,432 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK