Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual vs Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4

Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

26 reasons for

Chevrolet Captiva I, model available from 2006 to 2010.
It has 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Lada Niva 2131, model available from 1980.
It has 1.8 82HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4
Chevrolet

26 reasons for Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141KM manual in comparison to Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

141 > 82 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers look at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Chevrolet that has by 59 more horsepower in comparison to the Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4. Therefore the Chevrolet Captiva I will reach higher maximum speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Chevrolet Captiva I will also give seemingly better flexiblility in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

9.1 > 12.5 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Chevrolet's advantage. This vehicle consumes 3.4 l less gasoline in the mixed cycle when compared with the Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4. Note that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Chevrolet Captiva I is classified, is 7.5 l while the Chevrolet needs by 21 % more amount of fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

212 > 139 Nm
The Chevrolet Captiva I has 53 percent more torque when compared to the Lada. The difference at such level is quite big, so that the Chevrolet Captiva I will be seeding up significantly faster.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.5 > 22 s
If a swift driving is what you realy like, the Chevrolet will appeal to you as it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 10.5 s better than the Lada Niva 2131.
38

Trunk capacity

465 > 265 l
With more trunk space the Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull vehicle than the Lada Niva. If the size of the luggage compartment is appeals to you, the Chevrolet Captiva I will be better to choose as it is around 200 liters larger than the trunk of its contender.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

928 > 710 l
33

Top speed

175 > 135 km/h
The Chevrolet Captiva I has by 40 km/h grater maximum velocity when compared to the Lada, as a result of which a long route, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be traveled in much more shorter period of time. The difference might be noticeable during travelling over fast and long routes.
22

Width

1,853 > 1,680 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly influences on interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The width of the Chevrolet Captiva I is larger only by 173 mm than the Lada Niva 2131 and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” class amounts to around 1,797 millimeters and is by 56 mm larger than the width of the Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual.
19

Range

714 > 528 km
15

Wheelbase

2,709 > 2,700 mm
The Chevrolet has 9 millimeters longer wheelbase than Lada Niva 2131. As a result the Chevrolet is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
8

Engine capacity

2,405 > 1,775 cc
The engine capacity of the Chevrolet is by 630 cubic centimeters greater in comparison to the Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4. As a result the Lada Niva 2131 will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual will be of better performance, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Maximum load capacity

610 > 500 kg
6

Length

4,640 > 4,239 mm
The Chevrolet Captiva I is 401 millimeters longer in comparison to the Lada Niva 2131. Long cars have more interior space and also provide more storage space. Although the Chevrolet Captiva I occurs to be better pick for families or those who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Lada may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,572 > 1,400 mm
3

Price range

popular > cheap
1

Height

1,719 > 1,640 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 79 mm in favor of the Chevrolet Captiva I is not big and should not be really noticeable.
1

Model release date

2006 > 1980
1

Tire width

215 > 175 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,200 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Payload

2,158 > 1,872 kg
0

Front track

1,563 > 1,432 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Tire profile

70 > 80 %
0

Curb weight

1,545 > 1,369 kg

Łada

2 reasons for Łada Niva 2131 1.8 82KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual

Reasons for
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,200 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered determines an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is recommended to analyze a torque performance graph.
19

Fuel tank

66 > 64 l
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank capacity is Lada Niva which is able to take by 2 l more petrol compared with the Chevrolet.

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 2006 1980
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,158 kg 1,872 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK