The Chevrolet Captiva I has by 61 hp more horsepower in relation to Suzuki. The Chevrolet will be distinctly better accelerate owing to grater power. Also passing other cars while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with stronger motor.
The difference of 108 newton meters is really huge thanks to which the Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual features much more better flexibility of the engine, it speeds up a way faster and has stronger towing capacity.
The boot of the Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual is 353 l bigger in comparison to the Suzuki Jimny Standard. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Chevrolet Captiva I will be a way more convenient. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can transport.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The maximum velocity of the Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual is greater compared with this of the Suzuki Jimny Standard by 25, which allows the Chevrolet Captiva I to cover faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 25 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A wider range and a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s performance. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is worth to check a torque graph.
Width of a car directly influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The Chevrolet Captiva I is widther by 16 percent in comparison to the Suzuki Jimny Standard and is not really important. The average for the „compact SUV” class amounts to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 3 percent smaller than the width of the Chevrolet Captiva I.
The Suzuki loses with the Chevrolet Captiva I in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Chevrolet Captiva I is able to take by 24 l more fuel in comparison to its contender.
Chevrolet has 20 % longer wheelbase in comparison to the Suzuki Jimny Standard. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
The engine displacement of the Chevrolet Captiva I is by 85 percent bigger when compared to the Suzuki Jimny Standard. In a consequence the Suzuki Jimny Standard will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Chevrolet will be of better quality, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
The Suzuki Jimny Standard is shorter in relation to the Suzuki by o 995 mm , which makes that it is much more easier to maneuver in narrow tight streets. In the „mini 4x4” segment, in which the car of Suzuki manufacturer is palced, the medium length equals to 4,341 millimeters and is by 16 percent longer than the length of Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4.
Number of doors
There’s no question that the five-door Chevrolet Captiva I is more convenient and if you regularly carry more than one people then it’s the format to go for. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the back but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Suzuki Jimny generally look much cooler and for those who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Suzuki might be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
Model release date
Production of the older car commenced 8 years prior to its competitor hence we may expect that this car is equipped with not so modern technologies used.
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 1 percent to the advantage of the Chevrolet Captiva I is not big and should not be really noticeable.