Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual vs Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4

Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

21 reasons for

Chevrolet Captiva I, model available from 2006 to 2010.
It has 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

No reasons for

Suzuki Jimny Standard, model available from 1998.
It has 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2002.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4
Chevrolet

21 reasons for Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

141 > 80 hp
The Chevrolet Captiva I has by 61 hp more horsepower in relation to Suzuki. The Chevrolet will be distinctly better accelerate owing to grater power. Also passing other cars while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

212 > 104 Nm
The difference of 108 newton meters is really huge thanks to which the Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual features much more better flexibility of the engine, it speeds up a way faster and has stronger towing capacity.
38

Trunk capacity

465 > 112 l
The boot of the Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual is 353 l bigger in comparison to the Suzuki Jimny Standard. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Chevrolet Captiva I will be a way more convenient. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can transport.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

928 > 817 l
33

Top speed

175 > 140 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual is greater compared with this of the Suzuki Jimny Standard by 25, which allows the Chevrolet Captiva I to cover faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 25 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,005 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s performance. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is worth to check a torque graph.
22

Width

1,853 > 1,600 mm
Width of a car directly influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The Chevrolet Captiva I is widther by 16 percent in comparison to the Suzuki Jimny Standard and is not really important. The average for the „compact SUV” class amounts to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 3 percent smaller than the width of the Chevrolet Captiva I.
19

Fuel tank

64 > 40 l
The Suzuki loses with the Chevrolet Captiva I in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Chevrolet Captiva I is able to take by 24 l more fuel in comparison to its contender.
15

Wheelbase

2,709 > 2,259 mm
Chevrolet has 20 % longer wheelbase in comparison to the Suzuki Jimny Standard. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Engine capacity

2,405 > 1,300 cc
The engine displacement of the Chevrolet Captiva I is by 85 percent bigger when compared to the Suzuki Jimny Standard. In a consequence the Suzuki Jimny Standard will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Chevrolet will be of better quality, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

4,640 > 3,645 mm
The Suzuki Jimny Standard is shorter in relation to the Suzuki by o 995 mm , which makes that it is much more easier to maneuver in narrow tight streets. In the „mini 4x4” segment, in which the car of Suzuki manufacturer is palced, the medium length equals to 4,341 millimeters and is by 16 percent longer than the length of Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4.
4

Rear track

1,572 > 1,365 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Chevrolet Captiva I is more convenient and if you regularly carry more than one people then it’s the format to go for. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the back but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Suzuki Jimny generally look much cooler and for those who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Suzuki might be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Model release date

2006 > 1998
Production of the older car commenced 8 years prior to its competitor hence we may expect that this car is equipped with not so modern technologies used.
1

Height

1,719 > 1,705 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 1 percent to the advantage of the Chevrolet Captiva I is not big and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

7 > 4
0

Payload

2,158 > 1,418 kg
0

Front track

1,563 > 1,355 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″

Suzuki

No reasons for Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual


Cars specifications

Chevrolet Captiva I 2.4 i 16V FWD 141HP manual Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,158 kg 1,418 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK