Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual vs Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4

Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

Chevrolet Captiva II SUV, model available from 2011.
It has 2.4 DOHC 167HP petrol engine produced from 2011 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Jeep Compass SUV, model available from 2007.
It has 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4
Chevrolet

16 reasons for Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167KM manual in comparison to Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

230 > 222 Nm
Maximum torque of the Chevrolet Captiva II is 4 % bigger than the Jeep. As a result, the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV will accelerate somewhat swifter and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Chevrolet will burn up less fuel per 100 kilometers.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.5 > 10.7 s
The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 10.5 s, which is 0.2 s better result in relation to the Jeep Compass SUV. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into account when buying a vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

943 > 335 l
The boot of the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV is 181 percent more spacious than the Jeep Compass. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Chevrolet Captiva II will be a way more practical. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can take.
33

Top speed

190 > 183 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Chevrolet is greater in relation to of the Jeep Compass SUV by 4, which allows the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual to cover faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 7 kilometers per hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

7.4 > 7.6 l
15

Wheelbase

2,697 > 2,640 mm
The Chevrolet has 57 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Jeep Compass SUV. Thanks to this the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual have a higher speed count compared to the Jeep which means that Chevrolet Captiva II will have better acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racer at a timed event you would not even observe the difference.
8

Engine capacity

2,384 > 2,360 cc
The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual has 24 cubic centimeters bigger engine displacement than the Jeep Compass SUV. For the reason that the difference is little, the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual should accelerate only a bit faster, of course assuming that other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,668 > 4,404 mm
The Chevrolet is 264 millimeters longer when compared to the Jeep Compass. Long cars have more interior space and usually have plenty of trunk space. Although the Chevrolet occurs to be better choice for families or persons who appreciate comfortable driving, the Jeep Compass SUV may appeal to city drivers because it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,576 > 1,520 mm
1

Model release date

2011 > 2007
The difference in debut day between these two vehicles is only 4 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Chevrolet may have more advanced solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,727 > 1,630 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of putting big amount of thinks to it. The difference of 97 millimeters to the advantage of the Chevrolet Captiva II is small and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

235 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,567 > 1,520 mm
0

Curb weight

1,768 > 1,437 kg

Jeep

4 reasons for Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 167 hp
The horsepower of the Jeep Compass SUV is 2 percent bigger when compared to the Chevrolet. Because the difference is small this should not affect the car performance extensively.
112

Average consumption

8.7 > 8.9 l
The Jeep Compass uses 2 % fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Chevrolet Captiva II. The Jeep Compass SUV, being palced in „mini 4x4” segment burns up by 1.2 l more fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

10.5 > 11.7 l
The Jeep Compass burns 10 % less fuel in city traffic compared with the Chevrolet. The difference at the level of 10 percent is very big in daily using vehicle. Additionally, during many months it may give huge savings. Also note that estimated results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably raised if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars selected by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,500 > 4,605 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is delivered affects an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is recommended to analyze a torque graph.

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,495 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK