Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Kirakiraouji Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

14 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Chevrolet Captiva II SUV, model available from 2011.
It has 2.4 DOHC 167HP petrol engine produced from 2011 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual
Land Rover

14 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 167 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of drivers look at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 that has by 44 percent more horsepower in relation to the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual. Therefore the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d will reach higher top speed. Due to more horsepower the Land Rover should also give better flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

8.5 > 8.9 l
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d uses 0.4 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Chevrolet Captiva II. The Land Rover, being palced in „mini 4x4” segment burns up by 1 l more amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

338 > 230 Nm
Because of 47 % more torque, the engine of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Chevrolet. This, in turn, produces better a car's acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.6 > 10.5 s
If a swift driving is what you realy like, the Land Rover fits you better as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 28 % better than the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV.
33

Top speed

217 > 190 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Land Rover is greater in comparison to this of the Chevrolet Captiva II which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 27 km/h is little and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,605 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is this of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. The engine of the Chevrolet reaches its full efficiency at 4,605 revolutions per minute which is by 62 % worst result compared with the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.9 > 7.4 l
8

Maximum load capacity

710 > 461 kg
8

Gross trailer weight

1,796 > 1,495 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
To drivers who opt for less absorbing use of a car and who don’t want complications resulting from the manual transmission we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic gearbox. For those who have a flair for sport driving a stick shift might be better as it gives a control of rmp range in which a gear is changed.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,348 > 2,232 kg
0

Front track

1,625 > 1,567 mm

Chevrolet

7 reasons for Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167KM manual in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

943 > 575 l
With more boot size the Chevrolet will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional car than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. If the capacity of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Chevrolet Captiva II will be better to buy because it is about 368 l more spacious than the boot of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,576 > 1,447 l
15

Wheelbase

2,697 > 2,667 mm
The Chevrolet has 30 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. Thanks to this the Chevrolet Captiva II is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
8

Engine capacity

2,384 > 1,998 cc
The Chevrolet Captiva II has by 19 % bigger engine displacement than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,668 > 4,365 mm
The Chevrolet Captiva II is 303 millimeters longer than the Land Rover. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also have bigger trunk. Although the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who value comfortable driving, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d may appeal to women because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Height

1,727 > 1,635 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Chevrolet, which is by 6 percent higher than the Land Rover, is appropriate pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Curb weight

1,768 > 1,636 kg

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,796 kg 1,495 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2011 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK