The fuel economy is distinctly to Peugeot's advantage. This car burns 20 percent fewer fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Chevrolet Captiva II. Note that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the compact SUV segment, in which the Peugeot is classified, equals to 7.5 l whereas the Peugeot burns up by 5 percent less fuel than the average.
Maximum torque of the Peugeot 3008 is 4 percent greater than the Chevrolet. For this reason, the Peugeot 3008 will accelerate somewhat better and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the Peugeot 3008 1.6 THP 156HP manual will consume fever fuel for every 100 km.
The fuel consumption of the Peugeot is 15 % better in comparison to the Chevrolet Captiva II. Despite the fact that the difference is little, in the long run it may make that your vehicle would be significantly cheper to utilize.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower compared with the Peugeot. The
difference at the level of
15 % is
not really significant and it should
not be vitally taken into
consideration for choosing
one of presented
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Peugeot 3008 is greater compared with this of the Chevrolet Captiva II by 6, which allows the Peugeot 3008 to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 12 kilometers/hour is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Peugeot 3008 1.6 THP 156HP manual. The engine of the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual reaches its full efficiency at 4,605 revolutions per minute which is by 70 % worst result than the Peugeot 3008 1.6 THP 156HP manual.