The horsepower is a feature that most of us take into account at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 that has by 73 more horsepower when compared to the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual. Therefore the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 is able to achieve higher top speed. Because of more horsepower the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will as well give seemingly more flexiblility in specific gears.
The Subaru consumes 7 percent fewer fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Chevrolet Captiva II. The Subaru, which is classified in „small off-road 4x4” segment burns up by 0.8 l more of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
The Subaru has 120 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Chevrolet Captiva II. Although a large number of people do not take into account the maximum torque when choosing a automobile, it describes the best how fast a car acclerates. In this case the difference is quite big hence the Subaru will give you better feeling of driving.
The fuel consumption of the Subaru is 4 percent smaller when compared to the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long term it may make that your vehicle would be considerably cheper to utilize.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
If a fast driving is what you realy like, the Subaru Forester IV will appeal to you as it’s
acceleration to 100 km/h is
better in relation to
the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The maximum speed of the Subaru Forester IV is greater as compared to this of the Chevrolet which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 31 kilometers per hour is little and is imperceptible in daily driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A greater range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is reached affects an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. Still, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always worth to analyze a torque graph.
Maximum load capacity
Gross trailer weight
A Boxer engine put inside the
Subaru occurs to be distinctly
better because it is smaller and produces less vibrations in comparison to straight
Furthermore bear in mind
layout results in that a
automobile has a lower center of
gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one
put inside the Chevrolet, is that because of its simple construction it can be fuel efficient compared to
other types of engines.
Model release date
Given that the Chevrolet's production started only 2 years prior to the Subaru, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Subaru might have a bit more new solutions applied in it.
For people who prefer more functional driving a car and who don’t want complications that stems from the stick shift we recommend cars equipped with automatic transmission. To those who enjoy sporting driving a stick shift may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.