Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

Subaru Forester IV, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 XT 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

14 reasons for

Chevrolet Captiva II SUV, model available from 2011.
It has 2.4 DOHC 167HP petrol engine produced from 2011 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual
Subaru

16 reasons for Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 167 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of us take into account at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 that has by 73 more horsepower when compared to the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual. Therefore the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 is able to achieve higher top speed. Because of more horsepower the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will as well give seemingly more flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

8.3 > 8.9 l
The Subaru consumes 7 percent fewer fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Chevrolet Captiva II. The Subaru, which is classified in „small off-road 4x4” segment burns up by 0.8 l more of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 230 Nm
The Subaru has 120 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Chevrolet Captiva II. Although a large number of people do not take into account the maximum torque when choosing a automobile, it describes the best how fast a car acclerates. In this case the difference is quite big hence the Subaru will give you better feeling of driving.
56

Urban consumption

11.2 > 11.7 l
The fuel consumption of the Subaru is 4 percent smaller when compared to the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long term it may make that your vehicle would be considerably cheper to utilize.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 10.5 s
If a fast driving is what you realy like, the Subaru Forester IV will appeal to you as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 3 sek better in relation to the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,579 > 1,576 l
33

Top speed

221 > 190 km/h
The maximum speed of the Subaru Forester IV is greater as compared to this of the Chevrolet which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 31 kilometers per hour is little and is imperceptible in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,400 > 4,605 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is reached affects an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. Still, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always worth to analyze a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

7 > 7.4 l
8

Maximum load capacity

497 > 461 kg
8

Gross trailer weight

1,996 > 1,495 kg
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer engine put inside the Subaru occurs to be distinctly better because it is smaller and produces less vibrations in comparison to straight engine. Furthermore bear in mind its flat layout results in that a automobile has a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one put inside the Chevrolet, is that because of its simple construction it can be fuel efficient compared to other types of engines.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
Given that the Chevrolet's production started only 2 years prior to the Subaru, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Subaru might have a bit more new solutions applied in it.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For people who prefer more functional driving a car and who don’t want complications that stems from the stick shift we recommend cars equipped with automatic transmission. To those who enjoy sporting driving a stick shift may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %

Chevrolet

14 reasons for Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167KM manual in comparison to Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

943 > 505 l
The boot of the Chevrolet Captiva II is 87 % larger in relation to the Subaru Forester IV. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual will be a way more useful. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
22

Width

1,868 > 1,795 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual is 73 millimeters wider in relation to the Subaru Forester IV. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

730 > 706 km
19

Fuel tank

64 > 61 l
The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 gives way to the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV is able to take by 3 l more fuel in comparison to its contender.
15

Wheelbase

2,697 > 2,634 mm
The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV has 2 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Subaru. As a result the Chevrolet is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

556 > 536 km
11

Extra-urban range

878 > 857 km
8

Engine capacity

2,384 > 1,999 cc
The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual has 385 cubic centimeters larger engine size than the Subaru Forester IV. Because the difference is not big, the Chevrolet Captiva II should accelerate a bit faster, of course if other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,668 > 4,596 mm
The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV is 2 percent longer in comparison to the Subaru Forester IV. Long vehicles are more spacious and also provide plenty of trunk space. While the Chevrolet Captiva II seems to be better for families or those who value soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 may appeal to women because it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,576 > 1,547 mm
1

Tire width

235 > 225 mm
0

Payload

2,232 > 2,110 kg
0

Front track

1,567 > 1,545 mm
0

Curb weight

1,768 > 1,615 kg

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,996 kg 1,495 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK