Chevrolet HHR 2.0 Turbo 260HP manual vs Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual

Chevrolet HHR 2.0 Turbo 260HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

10 reasons for

Chevrolet HHR, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 Turbo 260HP petrol engine produced from 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Peugeot 807 Minivan, model available from 2002.
It has 2.0 16V 136HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2009.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual
Chevrolet

10 reasons for Chevrolet HHR 2.0 Turbo 260KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

260 > 136 hp
The Chevrolet is equipped with petrol which makes by 124 more horsepower than the the engine of the Peugeot 807, transforming the car to a more dynamic character. It should be better option to those who would like to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
56

Urban consumption

11.2 > 12.3 l
The Chevrolet burns up 9 % less fuel in city traffic in relation to the Peugeot 807. The difference at the level of 1.1 l will be quite significant in using car. Additionally, during many months it may give gigantic cost savings. Moreover note that presented results of the average fuel consumption may be considerably lifted if you ride swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles selected by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

6.2 > 12.2 s
The Chevrolet HHR 2.0 Turbo 260HP manual speeds up to 100k\h 6 sek faster than the Peugeot 807. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Chevrolet HHR 2.0 Turbo 260HP manual will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
38

Trunk capacity

1,634 > 225 l
The trunk of the Chevrolet HHR is 1,409 liters bigger in comparison to the Peugeot. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Chevrolet will be a way more functional. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
33

Top speed

241 > 185 km/h
The Chevrolet has by 30 % higher maximum velocity in comparison to the Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual, consequently a long distance, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be drived in much more shorter period of time. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on the road without speed limits.
1

Model release date

2006 > 2002
Given that the Peugeot 807 was launched only 4 years before the Chevrolet HHR, the gap between technology used in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Chevrolet may have slightly more new solutions applied in it.
1

Tire width

225 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,300 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Tire diameter

18 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

45 > 65 %

Peugeot

9 reasons for Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet HHR 2.0 Turbo 260HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.1 > 9.4 l
The Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual burns up 0.3 l less in the mixed cycle when compared to the Chevrolet HHR. The difference in the amount of 3 percent is not very appreciable. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
22

Width

1,850 > 1,759 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The Peugeot is widther only by 5 percent compared with the Chevrolet HHR 2.0 Turbo 260HP manual and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „van” segment equals to 1,821 millimeters and is by 29 mm smaller than the same feature of the Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual.
19

Range

879 > 521 km
19

Fuel tank

81 > 48 l
In this category it is the Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual that can carry 33 l more fuel than the Chevrolet HHR 2.0 Turbo 260HP manual. The medium fuel tank size in the van segment, which is represented by the Peugeot 807, amounts to 70 liters, whereas in van class (represented by the Chevrolet HHR) it equals 70 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,833 > 2,636 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual has 197 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Chevrolet HHR. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Peugeot 807 should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

650 > 438 km
6

Length

4,723 > 4,477 mm
The Peugeot is 246 mm longer in relation to the Chevrolet HHR 2.0 Turbo 260HP manual. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Peugeot very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Peugeot will be better driven but the Chevrolet will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
1

Height

1,759 > 1,588 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference that amounts to 11 percent in favor of the Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Curb weight

1,605 > 1,492 kg

Cars specifications

Chevrolet HHR 2.0 Turbo 260HP manual Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    Payload 1,898 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK