Chevrolet Kalos 1.4 82HP manual vs Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP

Chevrolet Kalos 1.4 82HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Matthias93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic

10 reasons for

Chevrolet Kalos, model available from 2004 to 2007.
It has 1.4 82HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

No reasons for

Mitsubishi Colt II, model available from 1984 to 1988.
It has 1.2 EL,GL 55HP petrol engine produced from 1984 to 1986.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP
Chevrolet

10 reasons for Chevrolet Kalos 1.4 82KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

82 > 55 hp
The Chevrolet Kalos 1.4 82HP manual has 49 % more horsepower in relation to Mitsubishi. The Chevrolet will be distinctly faster accelerate thanks to grater power. Also getting ahead of obstacles like TIRs or buses while driving should be much more easier for a car equipped with more powerful motor.
22

Width

1,670 > 1,635 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability during driving. The Chevrolet is widther by 2 % in relation to the Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP and is not really important. The medium for the „B” segment equals to approximately 1,645 millimeters and is by 25 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Chevrolet Kalos 1.4 82HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,484 > 2,373 mm
The Chevrolet Kalos 1.4 82HP manual has 5 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP. Consequently the Chevrolet Kalos is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
6

Length

3,880 > 3,875 mm
The Chevrolet is 5 millimeters longer when compared to the Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Chevrolet Kalos probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Chevrolet will be better driven but the Mitsubishi will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,409 > 1,338 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It is beyond the question that the five-door Chevrolet is more usable and if you regularly travel with more than one passenger then it’s the format to go for. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi Colt II generally look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP may be better one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Height

1,494 > 1,362 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of loading big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 10 % in favor of the Chevrolet is small and should not be really noticeable.
1

Model release date

2004 > 1984
0

Front track

1,451 > 1,391 mm
0

End of model sale

2007 > 1988

Mitsubishi

No reasons for Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55KM in comparison to Chevrolet Kalos 1.4 82HP manual


Cars specifications

Chevrolet Kalos 1.4 82HP manual Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 1984
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,503 kg -

Compare with other cars

By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK