Chevrolet Malibu II 5.7 180HP vs Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual

Chevrolet Malibu II 5.7 180HP

Source: wikipedia.org V8chevelle All Rights Released into the public domain

7 reasons for

Chevrolet Malibu II, model available from 1973 to 1977.
It has 5.7 180HP petrol engine produced from 1973 to 1977.
Drive has manual gearbox.

5 reasons for

Mazda 6 II Hatchback, model available from 2007 to 2012.
It has 1.8 MZR 120HP petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2010.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual
Chevrolet

7 reasons for Chevrolet Malibu II 5.7 180KM in comparison to Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

180 > 120 hp
The Chevrolet Malibu II has by 60 hp more horsepower in relation to Mazda 6 II. The Chevrolet Malibu II will be distinctly faster accelerate thanks to grater horsepower. Also leaving behind other vehicles while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with more powerful engine.
22

Width

1,946 > 1,780 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Chevrolet Malibu II is 166 millimeters wider than the Mazda 6 II. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

82 > 64 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank size is Chevrolet which can hold by 18 l more petrol than the Mazda.
15

Wheelbase

2,954 > 2,685 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Chevrolet Malibu II has 10 % longer wheelbase distance than Mazda. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Chevrolet Malibu II should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
6

Length

5,344 > 4,687 mm
The Chevrolet is 14 % longer than the Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual. Long cars more of passenger space and also have bigger trunk. While the Chevrolet Malibu II seems to be better for families or persons who value comfortable rides, the Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,544 > 1,539 mm
0

Front track

1,559 > 1,539 mm

Mazda

5 reasons for Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Malibu II 5.7 180HP

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

510 > 433 l
With more boot size the Mazda 6 II Hatchback will have much more room for loading things and be more functional one than the Chevrolet Malibu II. If the size of the luggage compartment is important to you, the Mazda 6 II Hatchback will be better to buy as it is around 18 % larger than the boot of its rival.
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car generally is a hatchback and for that reason the Mazda 6 II, which whole rear including the window lifts up and the rear seats folds flat making more room, has the edge on the 4-door Chevrolet which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
1

Height

1,434 > 1,365 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 69 millimeters in favor of the Mazda is little and should not be really noticeable.
1

Model release date

2007 > 1973
0

End of model sale

2012 > 1977

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Malibu II 5.7 180HP Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1973 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
    Payload - 1,886 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK