The Chevrolet Malibu II has by 60 hp more horsepower in relation to Mazda 6 II. The Chevrolet Malibu II will be distinctly faster accelerate thanks to grater horsepower. Also leaving behind other vehicles while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with more powerful engine.
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Chevrolet Malibu II is 166 millimeters wider than the Mazda 6 II. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank size is Chevrolet which can hold by 18 l more petrol than the Mazda.
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Chevrolet Malibu II has 10 % longer wheelbase distance than Mazda. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Chevrolet Malibu II should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
The Chevrolet is 14 % longer than the Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual. Long cars more of passenger space and also have bigger trunk. While the Chevrolet Malibu II seems to be better for families or persons who value comfortable rides, the Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.