Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic vs Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic

Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic

Source: similarcar.com All rights reserved

17 reasons for

Citroen C5 II Hatchback, model available from 2004 to 2008.
It has 2.0 HDi 136HP ic diesel engine produced from 2004 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback, model available from 2004 to 2007.
It has 2.2 145HP ic petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic
Citroen

17 reasons for Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136KM automat in comparison to Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.2 > 8.4 l
The Citroen C5 II Hatchback consumes 14 percent fewer in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Chevrolet Malibu V. The difference in the amount of 14 percent is not very appreciable. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it would allow you to make a real savings.
59

Maximal torque

320 > 210 Nm
The Citroen has 110 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback. Even though a large number of drivers do not attach importance the maximum torque when choosing a vehicle, it informs the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. In this case the difference is quite big and for that reason the Citroen will deliver you better feeling of driving.
33

Top speed

204 > 175 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Citroen C5 II Hatchback is higher as compared to this of the Chevrolet which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 17 percent is small and is not realy noticable in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,405 revolutions/minute
Such a big difference results from the fact that both cars have different engines. The Citroen C5 II is equipped with the diesel engine, the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback has the petrol engine. Because of the fact that these cars has different types of engines, comparing this characteristic seems to be pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.7 > 6.6 l
22

Width

1,785 > 1,773 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic is 12 millimeters wider than the Chevrolet. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

930 > 750 km
19

Fuel tank

65 > 62 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank size is Citroen C5 II Hatchback which can hold by 3 liters more oil than the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback.
12

Urban range

673 > 643 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,200 > 955 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 4 gears
The Citroen C5 II Hatchback have a higher speed count than the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic which means that Citroen will achieve better acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and unless you are drag racer at a timed event you would not notice the difference.
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2007
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,557 > 1,440 kg

Chevrolet

7 reasons for Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145KM automat in comparison to Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

145 > 136 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that majority of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic that has by 9 horsepower more in comparison to the Citroen C5 II, which makes this vehicle a bit faster. Due to more horsepower the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic should also give a bit better efficiency in specific speeds.
56

Urban consumption

9.8 > 10 l
The fuel consumption of the Chevrolet is 0.2 l smaller than the Citroen C5 II Hatchback. Despite the difference is insensible, in the long term it can cause that the vehicle would be much less expensive to use.
38

Trunk capacity

647 > 456 l
The Chevrolet Malibu V features 191 l more capable boot in comparison to the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic. Such a difference is quite big therefore it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Chevrolet has 40 percent bigger boot capacity than the average in its class. More spacious boot will be useful during family traveling and also while daily car’s usage.
15

Wheelbase

2,859 > 2,754 mm
The Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback has 4 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Citroen C5 II. Therefore the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
8

Engine capacity

2,189 > 1,998 cc
The Chevrolet has 10 percent bigger engine size in relation to the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic. Because the difference is not big, the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback should accelerate only slightly dynamically, assuming that other paramerters are equal.
6

Length

4,765 > 4,745 mm
The Chevrolet Malibu V is 20 millimeters longer than the Citroen. The length of the car is significant in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Chevrolet Malibu V very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Chevrolet will be better driven ,however, the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
1

Height

1,477 > 1,467 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of putting big amount of thinks to it. The difference that amounts to 1 percent to the advantage of the Chevrolet is small and should not be really noticeable.

Cars specifications

Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic
    Gross trailer weight 1,202 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 2004
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK