Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic vs Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual

Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

13 reasons for

Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback, model available from 2004 to 2007.
It has 2.2 145HP ic petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Renault Laguna II Hatchback, model available from 2001 to 2007.
It has 1.8 16V 120HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2005.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual
Chevrolet

13 reasons for Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145KM automat in comparison to Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

145 > 120 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that majority of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic that has by 21 % horsepower more in relation to the Renault, which makes this car somewhat quicker. Due to more horsepower the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic should also give a bit better flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

210 > 165 Nm
The Chevrolet has 45 Nm more torque in comparison to the Renault Laguna II. The difference at this level is quite big, so that the Chevrolet will be seeding up perceptibly faster.
56

Urban consumption

9.8 > 10 l
The Chevrolet burns up 0.2 l fewer petrol running around the town compared to the Renault Laguna II. The Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback, that comes from D class, consumes 0.8 l fewer fuel. Note that average fuel consumption in the urban for the middle class equals to 10.6 l, while the Chevrolet burns up by 7 % less amount of fuel than the average.
38

Trunk capacity

647 > 430 l
The Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic features 217 l bigger luggage compartment in comparison to the Renault Laguna II Hatchback. Such a difference is relevant so it will matters in terms of the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Chevrolet Malibu V has 40 % bigger trunk size than the average in its segment. Roomy luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also during daily car’s usage.
22

Width

1,773 > 1,768 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback is 5 millimeters wider than the Renault Laguna II. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,859 > 2,746 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Chevrolet Malibu V has 4 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Renault Laguna II Hatchback. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Engine capacity

2,189 > 1,784 cc
The Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic has 405 cubic centimeters larger engine capacity in comparison to the Renault Laguna II. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback should accelerate slightly better, if other paramerters are equal.
6

Length

4,765 > 4,576 mm
The Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback is 4 % longer than the Renault Laguna II Hatchback. The length of the car is significant in respect of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Chevrolet very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Chevrolet will be better driven ,however, the Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2004 > 2001
Because of the fact that the Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual was launched only 3 years prior to the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Chevrolet may feature a bit more new solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,477 > 1,427 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting big amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 50 mm to the advantage of the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic is small and does not matter much.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox installed in the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic despite having a few drawback gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city you probably would be less exhausted. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of changing gears in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 5,750 revolutions/minute
0

Curb weight

1,440 > 1,294 kg

Renault

12 reasons for Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.7 > 8.4 l
The Renault Laguna II burns up 8 % fewer in the combined cycle in relation to the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback. The difference in the amount of 8 percent is not very appreciable. Nevertheless in the long run it would allow you to make a real savings.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.7 > 11 s
A small difference at the level of 3 % shows that the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback is insensibly beaten in this confrontation. In the „large family cars” segment, to which the Chevrolet Malibu V is assigned, the average acceleration is 9.9 s and is by 11 percent faster than acceleration of Chevrolet’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

203 > 175 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Renault Laguna II Hatchback is higher as compared to this of the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 16 percent is not big and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,750 > 4,405 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached determines an engine’s performance. However, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always worth to see a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.1 > 6.6 l
19

Range

933 > 750 km
19

Fuel tank

71 > 62 l
In this category it is the Renault which can carry 9 l more fuel than the Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback. The medium fuel container capacity in the mid-size segment, which is represented by the Renault, amounts to 63 liters, whereas in large family cars class (represented by the Chevrolet) it amounts to 63 l.
12

Urban range

700 > 643 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,148 > 955 km
10

Number of gears

5 > 4 gears
The Renault Laguna II Hatchback has a one additional gear in relation to the Chevrolet. Most often this additional gear is a taller one thanks to which the previous gears can be shorter in order to allow increased performance in the lower speeds. One more gear also helps to decrease fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Malibu V Hatchback 2.2 145HP automatic Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 2001
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
    Payload - 1,866 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK