The horsepower is a parameter that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Chevrolet Orlando that has by 15 horsepower more than the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual, which makes this vehicle a bit quicker. Having more horsepower the Chevrolet Orlando will as well provide slightly better flexiblility in specific speeds.
Maximum torque of the Chevrolet Orlando is 18 percent bigger than the Ford C-MAX II. Because of this, the Chevrolet Orlando will accelerate somewhat faster and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Chevrolet will burn up on average less fuel per 100 kilometers.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A little difference that amounts to 10 % suggests that the Ford C-MAX II Grand is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „minivan class, being represented by the Ford, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 11.7 s and is by 0.5 s higher than this of Ford car.
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Chevrolet Orlando is higher as compared to this of the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 8 % is small and is not realy noticable in daily use.
Width of a car influences on room in the cabin and also stability on road. The width of the Chevrolet Orlando is larger only by 19 % in relation to the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual and is not really worth considering. The average for the „minivan” segment equals to 1,785 mm and is by 21 percent smaller than the same feature of the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual.
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is Chevrolet Orlando that can hold by 4 l more petrol compared with the Ford C-MAX II.
The engine cubic capacity of the Chevrolet is by 36 percent bigger when compared to the Ford. In a consequence the Ford C-MAX II will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Chevrolet Orlando will be of better quality, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
Gross trailer weight
The Chevrolet Orlando is 135 millimeters longer in relation to the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual. The length of the vehicle is significant in terms of driving comfort and space in the boot. The Chevrolet Orlando very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Chevrolet Orlando will be better driven ,however, the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length .