Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual vs Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual

Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

25 reasons for

Chevrolet Orlando, model available from 2010.
It has 1.4T 140HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Mazda 5 II, model available from 2010.
It has 1.8 MZR 115HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual
Chevrolet

25 reasons for Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140KM manual in comparison to Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that majority of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Chevrolet Orlando which has by 25 horsepower more in comparison to the Mazda 5 II, which makes this vehicle a bit better in terms of high speed. Because of more horsepower the Chevrolet Orlando should as well provide slightly better flexiblility in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

6.2 > 7 l
The Chevrolet consumes 0.8 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle than the Mazda 5 II. The Chevrolet Orlando, which is classified in „minivan” class consumes by 0.3 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 6.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 164 Nm
Maximum torque of the Chevrolet is 22 % higher than the Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual. Because of this, the Chevrolet will accelerate a little bit better and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the Chevrolet Orlando will use fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
56

Urban consumption

7.6 > 9.1 l
The fuel consumption of the Chevrolet Orlando is 1.5 l smaller in comparison to the Mazda 5 II. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long term it can make that your vehicle would be noticably cheper to exploate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11 > 12.8 s
The Chevrolet Orlando can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 11 sek, which is 14 percent faster in relation to the Mazda. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
38

Trunk capacity

456 > 157 l
The boot of the Chevrolet is 190 percent larger than the Mazda 5 II. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Chevrolet will be much more practical. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can hold.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

854 > 779 l
33

Top speed

200 > 182 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual is greater compared with this of the Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual by 18 km/h, which allows the Chevrolet Orlando to overcome faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 18 kilometers/hour is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is produced distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Chevrolet. The engine of the Mazda reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 54 percent lower than the Chevrolet Orlando.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.4 > 6 l
22

Width

2,165 > 1,988 mm
distance between left and right side of a car influences on room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The Chevrolet Orlando is widther only by 177 mm in comparison to the Mazda 5 II and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „minivan” segment equals to around 1,785 millimeters and is by 21 % larger than the same feature of the Chevrolet Orlando.
19

Range

1,032 > 833 km
19

Fuel tank

63 > 60 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Chevrolet that can take by 3 l more gasoline in comparison to the Mazda.
15

Wheelbase

2,760 > 2,750 mm
The Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual has 10 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual. Therefore the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

842 > 645 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,185 > 1,000 km
8

Maximum load capacity

640 > 615 kg
6

Length

4,655 > 4,585 mm
The Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual is 2 percent longer when compared to the Mazda 5 II. Long cars are more spacious and also provide bigger trunk. Although the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual seems to be better choice for families or persons who love the idea of comfortable driving, the Mazda may be more appropriate to the young because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,591 > 1,518 mm
1

Height

1,634 > 1,614 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Chevrolet, which is by 20 mm higher than the Mazda, is better choice for you. However, compared cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 5,300 revolutions/minute
0

Maximal roof load

100 > 75 kg
0

Payload

2,179 > 2,086 kg
0

Front track

1,584 > 1,531 mm
0

Curb weight

1,544 > 1,465 kg

Mazda

2 reasons for Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual

Reasons for
9

Ground clearance

131 > 121 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in many relevant features of a car. Ride height is the most important in SUV cars still all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Mazda 5 II has 10 mm higher clearance in relation to the Chevrolet Orlando. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high curbs, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,798 > 1,362 cc
The engine displacement of the Mazda is by 436 cubic centimeters greater than the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual. As a result the Chevrolet Orlando will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Mazda will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,101 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class minivan minivan
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK