The horsepower is a parameter that majority of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Chevrolet Orlando which has by 25 horsepower more in comparison to the Mazda 5 II, which makes this vehicle a bit better in terms of high speed. Because of more horsepower the Chevrolet Orlando should as well provide slightly better flexiblility in specific speeds.
The Chevrolet consumes 0.8 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle than the Mazda 5 II. The Chevrolet Orlando, which is classified in „minivan” class consumes by 0.3 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 6.5 l.
Maximum torque of the Chevrolet is 22 % higher than the Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual. Because of this, the Chevrolet will accelerate a little bit better and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the Chevrolet Orlando will use fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
The fuel consumption of the Chevrolet Orlando is 1.5 l smaller in comparison to the Mazda 5 II. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long term it can make that your vehicle would be noticably cheper to exploate.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Chevrolet Orlando can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 11 sek, which is 14 percent faster in relation to the Mazda. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
The boot of the Chevrolet is 190 percent larger than the Mazda 5 II. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Chevrolet will be much more practical. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can hold.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The maximum speed of the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual is greater compared with this of the Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual by 18 km/h, which allows the Chevrolet Orlando to overcome faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 18 kilometers/hour is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is produced distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Chevrolet. The engine of the Mazda reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 54 percent lower than the Chevrolet Orlando.
distance between left and right side of a car influences on room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The Chevrolet Orlando is widther only by 177 mm in comparison to the Mazda 5 II and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „minivan” segment equals to around 1,785 millimeters and is by 21 % larger than the same feature of the Chevrolet Orlando.
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Chevrolet that can take by 3 l more gasoline in comparison to the Mazda.
The Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual has 10 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual. Therefore the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
Maximum load capacity
The Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual is 2 percent longer when compared to the Mazda 5 II. Long cars are more spacious and also provide bigger trunk. Although the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual seems to be better choice for families or persons who love the idea of comfortable driving, the Mazda may be more appropriate to the young because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Chevrolet, which is by 20 mm higher than the Mazda, is better choice for you. However, compared cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.