Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual vs Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual

Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

29 reasons for

Chevrolet Orlando, model available from 2010.
It has 1.4T 140HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Renault Scenic I Minivan, model available from 1996 to 2003.
It has 1.4 i 75HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 1999.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual
Chevrolet

29 reasons for Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140KM manual in comparison to Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 75 hp
The Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with petrol which produce by 65 more horsepower than the Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It should be better option for drivers who would like to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
112

Average consumption

6.2 > 8.4 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Chevrolet's advantage. This automobile burns 26 percent less gasoline in the mixed cycle when compared with the Renault. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the minivan segment, in which the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual is classified, equals to 6.5 l while the Chevrolet Orlando burns up by 5 % less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 107 Nm
The Chevrolet Orlando has 87 % more torque in relation to the Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual. Although most of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when choosing a car, it reflects the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is quite big thus the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual will deliver you better sensation of driving.
56

Urban consumption

7.6 > 10.9 l
The Chevrolet Orlando uses of 3.3 l fuel fewer in city traffic in comparison to the Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual. The Chevrolet Orlando, which is classified in minivan segment, uses of 0.6 l/100Km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “minivan” segment equals to 8.2 l per 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11 > 16.2 s
If a swift driving is what you enjoy, the Chevrolet is better for you as it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 32 percent faster than the Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual.
38

Trunk capacity

456 > 412 l
If you are looking for a vehicles by which you could set of for travels, which could room more things in the boot , pick the Chevrolet Orlando. The Renault has by 44 liters smaller luggage compartment compared with the Renault Scenic I Minivan so you would be able to carry one bag less. Examining the luggage compartment also pay attention to its dimensions which have notable impact on loading capability .
33

Top speed

200 > 160 km/h
The Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual has by 40 km/h smaller maximum velocity than the Chevrolet Orlando, as a result of which driving a long route, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, will need more time. The difference may be noticeable during riding on highways to the car of Chevrolet brand advantage.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual. The engine of the Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual reaches its full efficiency at 4,000 revolutions per minute which is by 2,145 revolutions/minute worst result compared with the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.4 > 6.6 l
22

Width

2,165 > 1,719 mm
The Chevrolet Orlando is more difficult to perform maneuvers compared to the Renault Scenic I Minivan and parking might pose challenging as well as driving through bussy streets in a jammed city, however, in our opinion that advantages like roomy interior, firmer driveability when cornering entails that the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual is the one that it is better to buy.
19

Range

1,032 > 732 km
19

Fuel tank

63 > 61 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Chevrolet that can hold 3 percent more fuel than the Renault Scenic I Minivan. The average fuel tank capacity in the minivan class, from which the Chevrolet comes from, is 57 l, whereas in minivan class (represented by the Renault Scenic I) it is 57 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,760 > 2,586 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual has 7 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Chevrolet Orlando should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

842 > 550 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,185 > 909 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual have a higher gear count in comparison to the Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual which means that Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual should achieve better acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
9

Ground clearance

121 > 120 mm
Ground clearance means the gap between the car body and the ground. From these two cars, it is the Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual that has 1 mm higher ground clearance in relation to the Renault Scenic I. This is why the Chevrolet will cope better in difficult terrain and high curbs in the city. One drawback is the higher ride height means a higher center of gravity, which can adversely influence the handling of the Chevrolet Orlando.
8

Maximum load capacity

640 > 480 kg
6

Length

4,655 > 4,169 mm
The Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual is 12 % longer than the Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual. Long vehicles more of passenger space and also have plenty of trunk space. While the Chevrolet seems to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate convenient driving, the Renault Scenic I Minivan may appeal to singles as it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,591 > 1,485 mm
1

Height

1,634 > 1,600 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of loading massive amount of luggage to it. The difference that amounts to 34 mm to the advantage of the Chevrolet is small and should not be really noticeable.
1

Model release date

2010 > 1996
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Payload

2,179 > 1,580 kg
0

Front track

1,584 > 1,451 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Curb weight

1,544 > 1,108 kg

Renault

2 reasons for Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual

Reasons for
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,798 > 854 l
8

Engine capacity

1,391 > 1,362 cc
The Renault Scenic I has by 2 % bigger engine size when compared to the Chevrolet Orlando. This play a little role in terms of acceleration, as both values does not differ much.

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T 140HP manual Renault Scenic I Minivan 1.4 i 75HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,101 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class minivan minivan
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK