Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback 1.0L DOHC 68HP manual vs Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual

Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback 1.0L DOHC 68HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback, model available from 2009.
It has 1.0L DOHC 68HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d, model available from 2005.
It has 1.4 D-4D 55HP diesel engine produced from 2005 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual
Chevrolet

12 reasons for Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback 1.0L DOHC 68KM manual in comparison to Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

68 > 55 hp
The horsepower of the Chevrolet Spark II is by 24 percent grater than the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d. Because the difference is not big this should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

15.5 > 16.8 s
A little difference in the amount of 1.3 s suggests that the Toyota Aygo is the worst car of these two compared. In the „A class, being represented by the Toyota Aygo, the medium acceleration is 14.4 s and is by 2.4 s higher than this of Toyota car.
38

Trunk capacity

170 > 139 l
With more boot size the Chevrolet Spark II will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull car compared with the Toyota. If the size of the luggage compartment is important to you, the Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback will be better to buy as it is around 22 percent larger than the boot of its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,375 > 2,348 mm
The Chevrolet has 27 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Toyota. Thanks to this the Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback 1.0L DOHC 68HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
6

Length

3,640 > 3,416 mm
The Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback is 7 % longer when compared to the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and usually provide more storage space. While the Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback 1.0L DOHC 68HP manual seems to be better for families or those who appreciate comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,419 > 1,407 mm
1

Model release date

2009 > 2005
The difference in debut day between compared cars is only 4 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback 1.0L DOHC 68HP manual may feature more advanced technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,520 > 1,465 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback, which is by 4 % higher than the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d, is better option for you. However, these two cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Payload

1,354 > 1,242 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Curb weight

1,058 > 894 kg

Toyota

10 reasons for Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback 1.0L DOHC 68HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

5.5 > 6.6 l
The Toyota uses of 1.1 l diesel less running around the town than the Chevrolet. The Toyota, which is classified in minicompact cars class, uses of 1 l per 100 km less than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “minicompact cars” class equals to 6.5 l per 100 km.
22

Width

1,619 > 1,597 mm
Width of a car directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual is larger only by 22 mm in comparison to the Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback and is not really relevant. The average for the „A” segment amounts to approximately 1,549 millimeters and is by 5 percent larger than the same attribute of the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d.
19

Fuel tank

36 > 34 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank capacity is Toyota Aygo that is able to take by 6 percent more fuel in relation to the Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback.
12

Urban range

636 > 530 km
8

Engine capacity

1,453 > 995 cc
The Toyota Aygo has 46 percent bigger engine capacity when compared to the Chevrolet Spark II. The difference is relatively big. Consequently the Toyota should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine size affects worst fuel consumption.
8

Maximum load capacity

355 > 302 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,400 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,414 > 1,410 mm
0

Tire diameter

14 > 13 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 80 %

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Spark II Hatchback 1.0L DOHC 68HP manual Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2009 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class A A
    Payload 1,354 kg 1,242 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK