The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Colt II is by 12 percent grater when compared to the Chevrolet Sprint. As the difference is not big it should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
distance between left and right side of a vehicle affects room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The width of the Mitsubishi Colt II is larger by 103 mm compared with the Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49HP manual and is not really relevant. The medium for the „B” segment is 1,645 millimeters and is by 10 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP.
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is Mitsubishi Colt II that is able to carry by 14 liters more petrol in comparison to the Chevrolet Sprint.
The Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP has 6 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49HP manual. Consequently the Mitsubishi Colt II is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
The Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP is 8 percent longer when compared to the Chevrolet. The length of the car is significant in respect of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Mitsubishi Colt II very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi Colt II will be better driven ,however, the Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP, which is by 1 percent higher than the Chevrolet Sprint, would be appropriate choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.