Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP vs Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49HP manual

Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

8 reasons for

Mitsubishi Colt II, model available from 1984 to 1988.
It has 1.2 EL,GL 55HP petrol engine produced from 1984 to 1986.
Drive has manual gearbox.

No reasons for

Chevrolet Sprint, model available from 1984 to 1988.
It has 1.0 i 49HP petrol engine produced from 1984 to 1988.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49HP manual
Mitsubishi

8 reasons for Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55KM in comparison to Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

55 > 49 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Colt II is by 12 percent grater when compared to the Chevrolet Sprint. As the difference is not big it should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
22

Width

1,635 > 1,532 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle affects room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The width of the Mitsubishi Colt II is larger by 103 mm compared with the Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49HP manual and is not really relevant. The medium for the „B” segment is 1,645 millimeters and is by 10 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP.
19

Fuel tank

44 > 30 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is Mitsubishi Colt II that is able to carry by 14 liters more petrol in comparison to the Chevrolet Sprint.
15

Wheelbase

2,373 > 2,235 mm
The Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP has 6 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49HP manual. Consequently the Mitsubishi Colt II is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
6

Length

3,875 > 3,584 mm
The Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP is 8 percent longer when compared to the Chevrolet. The length of the car is significant in respect of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Mitsubishi Colt II very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi Colt II will be better driven ,however, the Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,338 > 1,300 mm
1

Height

1,362 > 1,349 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP, which is by 1 percent higher than the Chevrolet Sprint, would be appropriate choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Front track

1,391 > 1,334 mm

Chevrolet

No reasons for Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP


Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP Chevrolet Sprint 1.0 i 49HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1984 1984
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    End of model sale 1988 1988
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK