Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

24 reasons for

Chevrolet Suburban GMT800, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 5.3 i V8 288HP ic petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

5 reasons for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
Chevrolet

24 reasons for Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288KM automat in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

288 > 124 hp
The Ford Maverick II quite much gives way to the Chevrolet in the field of horsepower having them by 132 percent less. Consequently the engine installed in the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 ,unlike the Ford Maverick II, provides lots of power and good acceleration.
59

Maximal torque

440 > 175 Nm
The difference of 265 Nm is really colossal because of which the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic has much more better flexibility of the engine, it speeds up a way faster and has stronger towing power.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9 > 13.5 s
If a fast driving is what you enjoy, the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 fits you better as it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 33 percent faster compared to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual.
38

Trunk capacity

1,288 > 985 l
The Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 features 303 l more capable luggage compartment in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. Such a difference is quite significant so it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 has 71 percent bigger boot size than the average in the same class. Larger luggage compartment will be useful during family journeys as well as during everyday car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

3,722 > 1,941 l
33

Top speed

190 > 166 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic is greater in relation to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual by 14, which allows the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 14 % is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,005 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s performance. Still, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always worth to check a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,997 > 1,781 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic is 12 percent wider than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

745 > 592 km
19

Fuel tank

116 > 57 l
15

Wheelbase

3,305 > 2,619 mm
The Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic has 26 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. The closer the axles are to one another, the less time exists for shock absorption by the separate suspension components. Thus the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 with a longer wheelbase will give the smoothest travel. But, the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual with shorter distance between its axles have tighter turning angles and is able corner faster than equivalent cars having longer wheelbases.
14

Cylinders

8 > 4
12

Urban range

696 > 443 km
8

Engine capacity

5,327 > 1,990 cc
The Chevrolet has 168 percent larger engine capacity when compared to the Ford Maverick II. Such a substantial difference causes that comparision of this parameters is quite difficult. The Ford Maverick II would be the good choice for drivers who apreciate lower fuel consumption and owning costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, those who decided on the Chevrolet would take adventage of grater power, durability, smoothness of the engine and as a result more fun from driving.
6

Length

5,570 > 4,394 mm
The Chevrolet is longer in comparison to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual by 27 percent and it offers to its passengers much more space for legs inside the car as well as it has more roomy boot. In the „large off-road 4x4” segment, to which the car of brand Chevrolet is assigned, the average length amouts to 4,713 millimeters and is by 857 millimeters greater than the length of the Chevrolet.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a better version of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which according to us is a better choice. Engine of V characteristic installed in a vehicle the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 produces more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor may house high numbers of cylinders in a smaller package. A Better engine work and nicer sound is to driving fans certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Tire width

245 > 225 mm
1

Height

1,862 > 1,722 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of putting big amount of luggage to it. The difference of 140 millimeters to the advantage of the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a smooth drive around town, it is good to have an automatic but the type of transmisison may have a substantial effect on fuel consumption. Automatics may burn up more or less from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 5,300 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

9 > 5
0

Payload

2,173 > 1,936 kg
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Curb weight

2,310 > 1,469 kg

Ford

5 reasons for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.8 > 15.7 l
The Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual burns up 5.9 l less fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800. The difference at the level of 5.9 l will be quite realy noticeable in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long period of time it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

13.3 > 16.8 l
The fuel consumption while driving inside city is considerably to the Ford Maverick II's advantage. This automobile burns 21 % fewer gasoline in the city when compared to the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800. Better fuel consumption equals an increase in cruising range.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2006
0

Tire profile

70 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2000 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Code name GMT800 -
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK