Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

15 reasons for

Chevrolet Suburban GMT800, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 5.3 i V8 288HP ic petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

7 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
Chevrolet

15 reasons for Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288KM automat in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

288 > 170 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of car fans look at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Chevrolet that has by 69 % more horsepower in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. Consequently the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 can achieve higher maximum speed. With more horsepower the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 will as well provide seemingly better flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

440 > 253 Nm
The Chevrolet has 74 % more torque when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The difference at such level is relevant, so that the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 will be seeding up perceptibly faster.
56

Urban consumption

16.8 > 17.5 l
The Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 consumes 0.7 l less petrol in city traffic in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic, which represents large SUV segment, uses 2 liters fewer petrol. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the large 4x4 segment is 14.8 l, while the Chevrolet needs by 13 % more fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9 > 12.8 s
If a fast driving is what you are really in to, the Chevrolet fits you better as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 3.8 s better in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I.
33

Top speed

190 > 175 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic is greater as compared to this of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 15 kilometers per hour is not big and is imperceptible in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,005 > 4,495 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is reached affects an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to analyze a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,997 > 1,695 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic is 302 millimeters wider when compared to the Mitsubishi. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

3,305 > 2,725 mm
The Chevrolet has 580 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. Therefore the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

5,327 > 2,971 cc
The Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic has 79 % bigger engine capacity in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The difference is relatively large. For this reason the Chevrolet should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine capacity usually equals worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

5,570 > 4,610 mm
The Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 is 21 percent longer when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic will be better driven but the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 will be a little easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2000 > 1996
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared cars is only 4 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Chevrolet may have more advanced technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,862 > 1,720 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Chevrolet Suburban GMT800, which is by 8 percent higher than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4, would be appropriate choice for you. However, compared cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Number of seats

9 > 5
0

Curb weight

2,310 > 1,835 kg

Mitsubishi

7 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

13.5 > 15.7 l
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 consumes 2.2 l less in the mixed cycle than the Chevrolet. The difference at the level of 2.2 l is not significant. Nevertheless within some time it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
24

Extra-urban consumption

10.9 > 13.1 l
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,200 revolutions/minute
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2006
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Tire profile

70 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Suburban GMT800 5.3 i V8 288HP automatic Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2000 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Code name GMT800 -
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK