Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 4.8 i V8 278HP automatic vs Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4

Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 4.8 i V8 278HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic

21 reasons for

Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840, model available from 1999 to 2006.
It has 4.8 i V8 278HP ic petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2004.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

3 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin, model available from 1999 to 2004.
It has 1.8 GDI 120HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2000.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4
Chevrolet

21 reasons for Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 4.8 i V8 278KM automat in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

278 > 120 hp
The Chevrolet has by 158 hp more horsepower than Mitsubishi. The Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 will be distinctly more dynamically accelerate thanks to grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing cars or obstacles while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for the Chevrolet equipped with more powerful motor.
38

Trunk capacity

460 > 163 l
The trunk of the Chevrolet is 182 percent larger than the Mitsubishi. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 4.8 i V8 278HP automatic will be much more functional. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can take with you on a journey.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,919 > 800 l
33

Top speed

170 > 168 km/h
The maximum velocity of the Chevrolet is greater in comparison to this of the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4 which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 2 kilometers/hour is little and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,999 > 1,695 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The width of the Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 4.8 i V8 278HP automatic is larger by 18 percent compared with the Mitsubishi and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large 4x4 ” segment amounts to approximately 1,866 mm and is by 133 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840.
19

Fuel tank

97 > 52 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 that can comprise 45 liters more fuel than the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin. The average fuel tank size in the large SUV segment, from which the Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 4.8 i V8 278HP automatic comes from, amounts to 84 l, whereas in large 4x4 class (represented by the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin) it amounts to 84 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,942 > 2,451 mm
The Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 4.8 i V8 278HP automatic has 20 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Mitsubishi. Therefore the Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
14

Cylinders

8 > 4
12

Urban range

624 > 477 km
8

Engine capacity

4,807 > 1,833 cc
Naturally the Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 wins in this category. The difference at the level of 2,974 cc in comparison to engine of the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin. It is interesting that in „large SUV” segment, from which the Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 comes from, the average engine displacement equals 3,614 cubic centimeters and the biggest engine capacity in this segment amounts to 8,128 .
8

Maximum load capacity

686 > 480 kg
6

Length

5,057 > 4,035 mm
The Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 is longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi by 25 % and it gives to its passengers much more room inside the vehicle as well as it has more capable boot. In the „full-size SUV” class, to which the car of brand Chevrolet is assigned, the average length amouts to 4,713 mm and is by 344 mm greater than the length of the Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a improved version of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which in our opinion} is with more adventages. Engine of V layout put inside a car the Chevrolet gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may contain more cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Better engine work and pleasant sound is undoubtedly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door Chevrolet is more convenient and if you frequently carry more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin generally look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin might be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Tire width

245 > 215 mm
1

Height

1,881 > 1,700 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Chevrolet, which is by 181 mm higher than the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin, would be better choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For those who value less absorbing use of a car and don’t want complications that stems from the manual transmission we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic gearbox. To those who enjoy sporting driving a manual gearbox might be better as it gives a control of rmp range in which a gear is changed.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 5,250 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,952 > 1,690 kg
0

End of model sale

2006 > 2004
0

Curb weight

2,261 > 1,211 kg

Mitsubishi

3 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 4.8 i V8 278HP automatic

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

11.1 > 15.7 l
The Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4 uses 29 % less fuel in urban cycle compared with the Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840. The difference at the level of 4.6 l is very significant in using vehicle. Additionally, within years it will generate huge savings. Also note that estimated results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably lifted if you ride swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so huge that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Tire profile

65 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Tahoe GMT840 4.8 i V8 278HP automatic Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 1999
    Facelifting no no
    Code name GMT840 -
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK