Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual vs Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP manual 4x4

Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Dymogeek Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

15 reasons for

Jeep Wrangler II, model available from 1997 to 2006.
It has 2.4 i 16V 147HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2006.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio, model available from 1998 to 2004.
It has 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP manual 4x4
Jeep

15 reasons for Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

147 > 97 hp
The Jeep Wrangler II comes with petrol which produce by 52 percent more horsepower than the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It should be googd choice for drivers who would like to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
38

Trunk capacity

252 > 230 l
The boot of the Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual is only 10 percent bigger than the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP manual 4x4. However, the difference is not big it would be right to say that both cars have similar trunk space.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,044 > 678 l
33

Top speed

155 > 150 km/h
The top speed of the Jeep Wrangler II is greater as compared to this of the Chevrolet which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 5 km/h is small and is imperceptible in daily driving.
22

Width

1,694 > 1,630 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual is 64 millimeters wider in comparison to the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP manual 4x4. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

58 > 41 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual that can hold by 17 l more petrol in comparison to the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio.
15

Wheelbase

2,371 > 2,206 mm
Jeep has 7 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

407 > 300 km
8

Engine capacity

2,430 > 1,590 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Jeep is by 53 % greater in comparison to the Chevrolet. In a consequence the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP manual 4x4 will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

3,883 > 3,654 mm
The Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual is 229 mm longer in relation to the Chevrolet. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Jeep Wrangler II very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Jeep Wrangler II will be better driven ,however, the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
1

Height

1,782 > 1,650 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of putting big amount of luggage to it. The difference at the level of 132 mm in favor of the Jeep Wrangler II is not big and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

215 > 195 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2006 > 2004
0

Curb weight

1,603 > 1,234 kg

Chevrolet

3 reasons for Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual

Reasons for
3

Number of doors

3 > 2
In this case a user of the Chevrolet has a one door more at the back of a car. It will enable him to put stuff into a boot in more convenient way, especialy when we are talking about things of big size. Passages of both cars who are to seat in the rear need to get in a car through a front door which needs folding a front seat.
1

Model release date

1998 > 1997
Given that the Jeep Wrangler II's production started only 1 year earlier than the Chevrolet Tracker, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Chevrolet Tracker may have a bit more new solutions used in it.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4

Cars specifications

Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1997 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Code name TJ -
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK