The horsepower of the Nissan is by 18 horsepowers bigger in comparison to the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP manual 4x4. While the difference is not big this should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual has 43 % more torque than the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP manual 4x4. Even though most of drivers do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it shows the best how a vehicle is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is of considerable size thus the Nissan Qashqai II will give you better feeling of driving.
The Nissan Qashqai II consumes of 51 % petrol fewer in the city compared to the Chevrolet. The Nissan Qashqai II, which is classified in compact SUV segment, burns up 2.7 l per 100 km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “small off-road 4x4” segment is 9.6 l per 100 km.
The trunk of the Nissan Qashqai II is 208 l bigger in comparison to the Chevrolet Tracker. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will be a way more practical. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can carry.
The top speed of the Nissan Qashqai II is greater in comparison to of the Chevrolet by 22, which allows the Nissan to overcome quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 33 kilometers per hour is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A greater range and a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is delivered determines an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is recommended to check a torque graph.
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Nissan Qashqai II is widther only by 10 percent in relation to the Chevrolet Tracker and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” segment is approximately 1,797 mm and is by 3 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Nissan.
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank size is Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual which can hold by 13 liters more fuel compared with the Chevrolet Tracker.
Nissan has 20 % longer wheelbase in relation to the Chevrolet Tracker. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
Number of gears
The Nissan Qashqai II has only one extra
gear in comparison to the
Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio 1.6 i 16V 4WD 97HP manual 4x4. Usually this
additional gear is a taller one thanks to which the previous
speeds can be shorter to
allow better acceleration in the
lower speeds. One more speed as well helps to lower
fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
The Nissan is 20 percent longer when compared to the Chevrolet Tracker. The length of the car is important in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Nissan probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Nissan Qashqai II will be better driven ,however, the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
Number of doors
There’s no doubts that the five-door Nissan Qashqai II is more usable and if you frequently travel with more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Chevrolet Tracker generally look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Chevrolet Tracker Cabrio may be more appropriate.