The horsepower is a characteristic that most of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual which has by 12 percent horsepower more in comparison to the Ford Ecosport II, which makes this car slightly faster. Due to more horsepower the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual should also provide a bit better efficiency in specific speeds.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
If a swift driving is what you are keen on, the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual fits you better as it’s
acceleration to 100 km/h is
faster compared to
the Ford Ecosport II.
The top velocity of the Chevrolet is greater in comparison to of the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual by 6 kilometers per hour, which allows the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
The wheelbase of a car is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual has 34 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Chevrolet Trax should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
Number of gears
The Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual has a one more
gear in relation to the
Ford Ecosport II. Most often this
additional gear is used as an overdrive so that the previous
gears can be shorter to
allow increased acceleration in the
lower gears. One more gear as well helps
fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
The engine capacity of the Chevrolet Trax is by 364 cubic centimeters larger when compared to the Ford. As a result the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Chevrolet will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
The Chevrolet Trax is 4 millimeters longer in relation to the Ford Ecosport II. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and usually provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Chevrolet seems to be better choice for families or persons who appreciate convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Ford may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.