Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual vs Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

8 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Ford Ecosport II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
Chevrolet

8 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

140 > 125 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual which has by 12 percent horsepower more in comparison to the Ford Ecosport II, which makes this car slightly faster. Due to more horsepower the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual should also provide a bit better efficiency in specific speeds.
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 12.7 s
If a swift driving is what you are keen on, the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual fits you better as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 25 % faster compared to the Ford Ecosport II.
28

Top speed

186 > 180 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Chevrolet is greater in comparison to of the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual by 6 kilometers per hour, which allows the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
16

Wheelbase

2,555 > 2,521 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual has 34 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Chevrolet Trax should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Cylinders

4 > 3
9

Length

4,248 > 4,244 mm
The Chevrolet Trax is 4 millimeters longer in relation to the Ford Ecosport II. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and usually provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Chevrolet seems to be better choice for families or persons who appreciate convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Ford may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
Add a comment
4mm? is that a huge difference when in comes to parking the vehicle?
9

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual has a one more gear in relation to the Ford Ecosport II. Most often this additional gear is used as an overdrive so that the previous gears can be shorter to allow increased acceleration in the lower gears. One more gear as well helps to decrease fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
4

Engine capacity

1,364 > 1,000 cc
The engine capacity of the Chevrolet Trax is by 364 cubic centimeters larger when compared to the Ford. As a result the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Chevrolet will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.

Ford

4 reasons for Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

5.3 > 6 l
The Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual consumes 0.7 l less in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Chevrolet. The difference in the amount of 12 percent is not perceptible. Nevertheless in the long term it would give a substantial cost reduction.
54

Urban consumption

6.8 > 7.5 l
The Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual uses 9 percent less fuel in the city compared with the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. The difference at the level of 0.7 l will be quite significant in everyday use of car. Additionally, within years it will generate gigantic cost savings. Also keep in mind that presented results of the average fuel efficiency might be considerably lifted if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars selected by you is so big that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
23

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 5.2 l
20

Width

2,057 > 1,775 mm
Distance between two sides of a car influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Ford is larger only by 282 millimeters than the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual and is not really worth considering. The average for the „mini 4x4” class is approximately 1,797 millimeters and is by 260 mm smaller than the same feature of the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual.

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,205 kg -
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Price range popular popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK