Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic vs Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

14 reasons for

Ford Escape III, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual
Ford

14 reasons for Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180KM automat in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

180 > 140 hp
The Ford is equipped with petrol which makes by 29 % more horsepower over the the engine of the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It seems to be better choice to those who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

249 > 200 Nm
Maximum torque of the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic is 25 % bigger than the Chevrolet. For this reason, the Ford will accelerate slightly better and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the Ford Escape III will burn up fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
36

Trunk capacity

969 > 356 l
The trunk of the Ford Escape III is 613 l larger than the Chevrolet Trax. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic will be much more convenient. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can transport.
20

Width

1,841 > 1,775 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle affects room in the cabin as well as stability during driving. The Ford Escape III is widther only by 4 percent in comparison to the Chevrolet Trax and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „compact SUV” class is approximately 1,797 mm and is by 44 mm smaller than the width of the Ford Escape III.
20

Fuel tank

56 > 51 l
The Chevrolet Trax gives way to the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Ford Escape III is able to hold by 5 liters more fuel in relation to its contender.
16

Wheelbase

2,690 > 2,555 mm
Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic has 5 percent longer wheelbase than the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, cars with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
9

Length

5,422 > 4,248 mm
The Ford is longer in comparison to the Chevrolet by 1,174 mm and it offers to passengers much more room inside the car as well as it has more roomy trunk. In the „compact SUV” segment, to which the car of brand Ford is assigned, the average length amouts to 4,341 millimeters and is by 25 % greater than the length of the Ford Escape III.
8

Ground clearance

202 > 158 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the space between the vehicle body and the road. From these two cars, it is the Ford Escape III which has 28 percent higher ground clearance in comparison to the Chevrolet Trax. This is why the Ford will deal better in difficult terrain and high curbs in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the car.
4

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,364 cc
The Ford Escape III has 17 % greater engine capacity in relation to the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. As the difference is not big, the Ford Escape III should accelerate only a bit dynamically, of course if other paramerters are does not play a role.
3

Rear track

1,565 > 1,538 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic transmission which is in the Ford Escape III despite having a few disadvantages offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city the driver is more rested. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Front track

1,563 > 1,542 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,082 > 2,035 mm
0

Curb weight

1,584 > 1,322 kg

Chevrolet

8 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

6 > 10.8 l
The Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual burns up 44 percent less fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic. The difference at the level of 4.8 l will be quite realy noticeable in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long term it will bring you a substantial cost reduction.
54

Urban consumption

7.5 > 12.4 l
The fuel consumption running around the town is considerably to the Chevrolet Trax's advantage. This vehicle uses 4.9 l fewer petrol in built up area in comparison to the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic. Better fuel consumption equals less fuel cost passed on you.
29

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 2,500 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the maximum torque is produced shows us how fast an engine achieves its best efficiency with increase in rotational speed. The lower rotational speed or the wider range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt faster.
23

Extra-urban consumption

5.2 > 8.8 l
16

Range

867 > 528 km
12

Urban range

693 > 467 km
8

Extra-urban range

1,000 > 648 km
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 5,700 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,205 kg
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Price range popular popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK