Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual vs Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

21 reasons for

Ford Kuga II, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual
Ford

21 reasons for Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 140 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of us pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual which has by 10 horsepower more in relation to the Chevrolet Trax, which makes this vehicle a bit faster. Having more horsepower the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual will also give a bit better efficiency in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

240 > 200 Nm
The Ford has 40 newton meters more torque when compared to the Chevrolet. Even though the majority of drivers do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it shows the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is quite small and for that reason it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
38

Trunk capacity

456 > 356 l
The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual has 100 liters more capable boot than the Chevrolet Trax. Such a difference is significant and it will distinctly matters in terms of the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Ford Kuga II has 11 l bigger trunk capacity than the average in the same class. Larger boot will be useful during family traveling and also during daily car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,693 > 786 l
33

Top speed

195 > 186 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Ford Kuga II is greater than the Chevrolet Trax by 5, which allows the Ford Kuga II to cover quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 5 percent is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,600 > 1,855 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the maximum torque is reached shows us how fast an engine reaches its full output with increase in rotational speed. The lower revolutions or the longer range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt faster.
22

Width

1,838 > 1,775 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The Ford Kuga II is widther by 4 percent in comparison to the Chevrolet and is not really relevant. The average for the „mini 4x4” segment is 1,797 mm and is by 2 percent smaller than the width of the Ford Kuga II.
15

Wheelbase

2,693 > 2,555 mm
The Ford has 138 mm longer wheelbase in relation to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. Thanks to this the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
9

Ground clearance

190 > 158 mm
Ground clearance means the space between the vehicle underbody and the road. From these two cars, it is the Ford Kuga II which has 20 % higher ride height in relation to the Chevrolet Trax. For this reason the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual will deal better in difficult terrain and high curbs in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the car.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,364 cc
The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual has 17 percent bigger engine displacement than the Chevrolet Trax. As the difference is little, the Ford should accelerate slightly dynamically, assuming that other paramerters are the same.
8

Maximum load capacity

520 > 509 kg
8

Gross trailer weight

1,995 > 1,205 kg
6

Length

4,524 > 4,248 mm
The Ford is 6 percent longer in comparison to the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. Long cars have more interior space and usually have more storage space. While the Ford seems to be better pick for families or drivers who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Chevrolet Trax may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,538 mm
1

Tire width

235 > 215 mm
0

Rim width

7 > 6 mm
0

Payload

2,100 > 1,829 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 496 kg
0

Rim diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Front track

1,561 > 1,542 mm
0

Curb weight

1,580 > 1,322 kg

Chevrolet

7 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6 > 6.6 l
The Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.6 l fewer in the combined cycle in relation to the Ford. The difference at the level of 0.6 l is not significant. However in the long term it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

7.5 > 8.5 l
The fuel consumption of the Chevrolet Trax is 1 liter better in relation to the Ford Kuga II. Despite the difference is small, in the long run it can cause that the car would be much less expensive to use.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 9.7 s
The Chevrolet Trax accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 9.5 s, which is 0.2 s in relation to the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into consideration when buying a vehicle.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.2 > 5.6 l
1

Model release date

2013 > 2012
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual may have more advanced solutions.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″

Cars specifications

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,995 kg 1,205 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK