Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 vs Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual
Mazda

17 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

160 > 140 hp
The horsepower of the Mazda is by 14 % bigger than the Chevrolet Trax. While the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance to a large extent.
59

Maximal torque

207 > 200 Nm
The Mazda CX-5 has 4 % more torque in comparison to the Chevrolet. Even though the majority of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it informs the best how a vehicle acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is quite small and for that reason the difference will not be much noticeable.
38

Trunk capacity

503 > 356 l
With more boot size the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional vehicle than the Chevrolet Trax. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Mazda will be better to choose as it is about 41 percent more spacious than the boot of its competitor.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,622 > 786 l
33

Top speed

197 > 186 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Mazda is higher as compared to this of the Chevrolet Trax which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 6 percent is little and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,843 > 1,775 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Mazda is 68 mm wider in relation to the Chevrolet Trax. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

56 > 51 l
The Chevrolet Trax gives way to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 in the category of fuel tank size. The Mazda CX-5 is able to carry by 10 % more fuel compared with its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,555 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Mazda CX-5 has 145 mm longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Chevrolet. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Mazda CX-5 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
9

Ground clearance

209 > 158 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the gap between the car body and the road. taking these two cars into consideration, it is the Mazda that has 51 millimeters higher ground clearance in relation to the Chevrolet. For this reason the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 will deal better with rough terrain and obstacles in the city. One drawback is the higher ground clearance means a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the Mazda.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,364 cc
The Mazda CX-5 has 46 percent greater cubic capacity in comparison to the Chevrolet. The difference is relatively substantia. Consequently the Mazda should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater cubic capacity means worst fuel economy.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,803 > 1,205 kg
6

Length

4,537 > 4,248 mm
The Mazda CX-5 is 289 mm longer when compared to the Chevrolet Trax. Long cars more of passenger space and usually provide plenty of trunk space. While the Mazda occurs to be better choice for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual may be more appropriate to women as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,538 mm
0

Payload

2,000 > 1,829 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

726 > 496 kg
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,542 mm
0

Curb weight

1,500 > 1,322 kg

Chevrolet

11 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6 > 6.4 l
The Chevrolet Trax uses 6 percent less fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Mazda CX-5. The Chevrolet Trax, which is palced in „small off-road 4x4” class burns up by 1.5 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

7.5 > 7.9 l
The fuel consumption of the Chevrolet is 5 % smaller when compared to the Mazda. Despite the difference is little, in the long term it can make that your vehicle would be much less expensive to exploate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 10.5 s
A little difference at the level of 1 s shows that the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 is somewhat beaten here. In the „mini 4x4” class, to which the Mazda CX-5 is assigned, the medium acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 4 % slower than acceleration of Mazda’s vehicle.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. The engine of the Mazda achieves its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 54 percent lower compared with the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.2 > 5.8 l
19

Range

867 > 848 km
12

Urban range

693 > 691 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,000 > 966 km
8

Maximum load capacity

509 > 500 kg
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
Given that the Mazda was introduced only 2 years earlier than the Chevrolet Trax, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Chevrolet might feature slightly more modern solutions applied in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg 1,205 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK