Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

18 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual
Nissan

18 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 6 l
The Nissan Qashqai II burns up 0.4 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle than the Chevrolet Trax. The Nissan, which is classified in „compact SUV” segment consumes by 1.9 l less of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 7.5 l
The Nissan Qashqai II burns up 0.6 l fewer fuel in urban cycle in relation to the Chevrolet. The difference at the level of 0.6 l will be quite significant in everyday using car. Additionally, within many months it will bring huge savings. Moreover you shoule take int consideration that presented results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably lifted if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
38

Trunk capacity

438 > 356 l
The Nissan features 82 liters more capable luggage compartment in relation to the Chevrolet. Such a difference is relevant so it will distinctly is relevant to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Nissan Qashqai II has 7 l bigger trunk capacity than the average in its segment. Larger trunk will be useful during family traveling as well as during everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 5.2 l
22

Width

1,800 > 1,775 mm
Width of a vehicle affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability while driving. The Nissan Qashqai II is widther by 1 % in comparison to the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual and is not really relevant. The medium for the „compact SUV” class amounts to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 3 mm larger than the same feature of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual.
19

Range

982 > 867 km
19

Fuel tank

54 > 51 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Nissan Qashqai II that can carry 3 l more fuel in comparison to the Chevrolet Trax. The average fuel tank capacity in the small off-road 4x4 segment, from which the Nissan Qashqai II comes from, equals 61 liters, whereas in small off-road 4x4 class (represented by the Chevrolet) it is 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,555 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II has 3 % longer wheelbase when compared to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. As a result the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

797 > 693 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 1,000 km
8

Maximum load capacity

542 > 509 kg
6

Length

4,380 > 4,248 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is 3 percent longer in relation to the Chevrolet Trax. Long cars have roomy cabin and also have plenty of trunk space. While the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual occurs to be better option for families or persons who love the idea of convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Chevrolet Trax may be more appropriate to women because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,563 > 1,538 mm
1

Model release date

2014 > 2013
Given that the Chevrolet Trax started to be manufactured only 1 year earlier than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, the gap between technology used in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual might feature a bit more advanced solutions used in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 4,900 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,860 > 1,829 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

679 > 496 kg
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,542 mm

Chevrolet

10 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of us pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Chevrolet Trax which has by 22 percent horsepower more when compared to the Nissan, which makes this vehicle somewhat better in terms of high speed. With more horsepower the Chevrolet Trax should as well give somewhat more flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 190 Nm
The Chevrolet Trax has 10 Nm more torque in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. Although the vast majority of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it shows the best how fast a car acclerates. In this case the difference is insensible so it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 11.3 s
The Nissan Qashqai II can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower in comparison to the Chevrolet. The difference at the level of 1.8 s is quite little and it should not be strongly taken into account for choosing one of compared cars.
33

Top speed

186 > 183 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Chevrolet Trax is greater in comparison to this of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual by 2, which allows the Chevrolet Trax to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 kilometers/hour is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is delivered determines an engine’s performance. Still, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always good to see a torque performance graph.
8

Engine capacity

1,364 > 1,198 cc
The Chevrolet Trax has 166 cubic centimeters greater engine displacement in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. As the difference is little, the Chevrolet should accelerate slightly better, if other paramerters are equal.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,205 > 1,199 kg
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,322 > 1,314 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg 1,205 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2014 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK