Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual vs Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

13 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Opel Mokka, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 Ecotec 115HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual
Chevrolet

13 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual which has by 25 horsepower more in comparison to the Opel Mokka, which makes this vehicle somewhat quicker. With more horsepower the Chevrolet Trax will also give a bit more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 155 Nm
The Chevrolet has 45 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Opel. The difference at such level is quite big, so that the Chevrolet Trax will be seeding up significantly better.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 12.5 s
A little difference that amounts to 3 s indicates that the Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „mini 4x4 class, being represented by the Opel, the medium acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 1.6 s higher than this of Opel vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

356 > 354 l
If you need a car by which you could set of for travels, which could carry more things in the boot , go for the Chevrolet Trax. The Opel Mokka has by 1 percent smaller luggage compartment than the Opel Mokka so probably you would be able to load a bit less. When it comes to the boot also pay attention to its width length and height which have notable effect on loading possibility .
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

786 > 783 l
33

Top speed

186 > 170 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Chevrolet Trax is greater compared with the Opel Mokka by 9, which allows the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 9 % is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Chevrolet Trax. The engine of the Opel reaches its full efficiency at 4,000 revolutions/minute which is by 54 percent lower than the Chevrolet.
15

Wheelbase

2,555 > 2,551 mm
The Chevrolet Trax has 4 millimeters longer wheelbase than Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual. As a result the Chevrolet Trax is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Chevrolet Trax has only one extra speed compared to the Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual. Most often the extra speed is a very tall one thanks to which the previous gears can be shorter to give better acceleration in the lower gears. One more speed also have an effect on decreasing fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2012
Because of the fact that the Opel Mokka's production began only 1 year before the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Chevrolet Trax may have slightly more modern solutions used in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,542 > 1,540 mm
0

Curb weight

1,322 > 1,256 kg

Opel

11 reasons for Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.7 > 6 l
The Opel Mokka consumes 1.3 l fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle than the Chevrolet. The difference in the amount of 22 % will be perceptible in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

5.7 > 7.5 l
The Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual burns up of 24 % fuel fewer running around the town compared to the Chevrolet Trax. The Opel Mokka, which is classified in compact SUV class, burns up 3.9 l of fuel for every 100 km fewer than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “small off-road 4x4” segment equals to 9.6 l of fuel for every 100 km.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 5.2 l
22

Width

1,777 > 1,775 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Opel Mokka is 2 millimeters wider in relation to the Chevrolet Trax. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
Add a comment
Is 2 mm can make any difference
19

Range

1,149 > 867 km
19

Fuel tank

54 > 51 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank capacity is Opel that can carry by 6 percent more gasoline in relation to the Chevrolet.
12

Urban range

931 > 693 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,317 > 1,000 km
8

Engine capacity

1,599 > 1,364 cc
The Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual has by 17 % bigger engine capacity than the Chevrolet. This play a little role when it comes to accleration, as both values does not differ much.
6

Length

4,278 > 4,248 mm
The Opel is 1 % longer in relation to the Chevrolet Trax. The length of the vehicle plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Opel Mokka very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Opel will be better driven ,however, the Chevrolet Trax will be a little easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,542 > 1,538 mm

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,205 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK