Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual vs Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

18 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Peugeot 2008, model available from 2013.
It has 1.2 VTi 82HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual
Chevrolet

18 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 82 hp
The Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual has by 58 hp more horsepower in comparison to Peugeot 2008. The Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual will be distinctly quicker speed up because of bigger power. Also passing other vehicles should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with more powerful motor.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 117 Nm
Because of 83 newton meters higher torque, the engine of the Chevrolet Trax does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Peugeot 2008. This, in turn, have a positive impact on acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 13.5 s
The Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual speeds up to 100k\h by 30 % quicker in comparison to the Peugeot. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Chevrolet Trax will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
38

Trunk capacity

356 > 350 l
If you need a car for long journeys, which could load more things in the boot , pick the Chevrolet Trax. The Peugeot is equiped with by 6 liters smaller luggage compartment compared with the Peugeot 2008 so in this case you would be able to load one small parcel less. Assessing the boot also check its width length and height which have substantial effect on loading possibility .
33

Top speed

186 > 169 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Chevrolet is greater in comparison to this of the Peugeot which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 10 % is small and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 2,745 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower number of rotations at which the highest torque is reached determines an engine’s performance. Still, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is worth to see a torque graph.
22

Width

1,775 > 1,739 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual is 36 mm wider in comparison to the Peugeot 2008. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,555 > 2,548 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Chevrolet Trax has 7 mm longer wheelbase distance when compared to Peugeot. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Chevrolet Trax should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,364 > 1,200 cc
The Chevrolet Trax has by 14 % bigger engine displacement when compared to the Peugeot 2008. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,248 > 4,159 mm
The Chevrolet Trax is 89 millimeters longer in relation to the Peugeot 2008. The length of the car is important when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Chevrolet Trax very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual will be better driven but the Peugeot 2008 will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,538 > 1,487 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 5,750 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,829 > 1,577 kg
0

Front track

1,542 > 1,480 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,035 > 2,001 mm
0

Curb weight

1,322 > 1,046 kg

Peugeot

9 reasons for Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 6 l
The Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual consumes 1.1 l less fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Chevrolet Trax. The Peugeot, which is palced in „mini 4x4” class uses by 2.6 l less fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 7.5 l
The Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual burns up 1.5 l of fuel fewer in the city than the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. The Peugeot 2008, that comes from mini 4x4 segment, uses 3.6 l fewer gasoline, which is by 37 % better fuel consumption in comparison to the average in the same class. The difference in fuel economy between these two cars is quite significant, so note that so as to the comparison have a sense, you should pick up models of similar parameters.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,196 > 786 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.5 > 5.2 l
19

Range

1,020 > 867 km
12

Urban range

833 > 693 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,163 > 1,000 km
9

Ground clearance

166 > 158 mm
Ground clearance is a critical factor in many relevant features of a car. Clearance is the most important for off-road vehicles still all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual has 5 percent larger clearance when compared with the Chevrolet. Apart from effective mobility in rough terrain, the Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual will also be easier to overcome city obstacles like high kerbstones, for example.
8

Maximum load capacity

537 > 509 kg

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,205 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK