Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual vs Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

20 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy TCe 90HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
Chevrolet

20 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 90 hp
The Chevrolet Trax is equipped with petrol which makes by 56 percent more horsepower than the the engine of the Renault, giving the vehicle a much more sporty character. It should be better car for drivers who want to feel thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 135 Nm
Because of 48 % greater torque, the engine of the Chevrolet Trax does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Renault Captur. This, in turn, have a positive impact on acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 12.9 s
The Chevrolet speeds up to 100k\h by 26 percent quicker in comparison to the Renault. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Chevrolet Trax will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

786 > 453 l
33

Top speed

186 > 171 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Chevrolet Trax is greater in comparison to of the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual by 9, which allows the Chevrolet to overcome faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 9 % is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 2,500 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the highest torque is produced shows us how fast an engine reaches its full output with increase in rotational speed. The lower rotational speed or the wider range at which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt earlier.
19

Fuel tank

51 > 46 l
In this category it is the Chevrolet that can carry 11 percent more fuel in comparison to the Renault. The medium fuel tank size in the compact SUV segment, which is represented by the Chevrolet Trax, equals 61 liters, whereas in compact SUV segment (represented by the Renault) it is 61 liters.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual has only one more speed in comparison to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. Most often this extra speed is a very tall one so that the previous gears can be narrower to give increased acceleration in the lower gears. One more gear also have an effect on decreasing fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
8

Engine capacity

1,364 > 899 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Chevrolet is by 52 % bigger than the Renault. As a result the Renault Captur will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Chevrolet will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,248 > 4,122 mm
The Chevrolet Trax is 3 % longer in comparison to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. Long cars have more interior space and usually provide plenty of trunk space. While the Chevrolet occurs to be better pick for families or those who value soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Renault Captur may appeal to women because it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,538 > 1,514 mm
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 5,250 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,829 > 1,662 kg
0

Front track

1,542 > 1,529 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,322 > 1,100 kg

Renault

10 reasons for Renault Captur Energy TCe 90KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 6 l
The Renault Captur uses 0.9 l less in the mixed cycle than the Chevrolet Trax. The difference in the amount of 15 percent is not very appreciable. However in the long run it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 7.5 l
The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual consumes 20 percent fewer petrol while driving inside city in relation to the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. The Renault Captur, which represents compact SUV segment, burns up 3.6 l less fuel. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small off-road 4x4 segment equals to 9.6 l, while the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual needs by 37 % less fuel than the average.
38

Trunk capacity

377 > 356 l
The boot of the Renault Captur is only 21 l bigger than the Chevrolet Trax. However, the difference is so little that it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar boot space.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 5.2 l
22

Width

1,778 > 1,775 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Renault Captur is 3 mm wider in relation to the Chevrolet Trax. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

918 > 867 km
15

Wheelbase

2,601 > 2,555 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual has 2 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Chevrolet. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Renault should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

750 > 693 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,047 > 1,000 km
8

Maximum load capacity

557 > 509 kg

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,205 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK