Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

21 reasons for

Subaru Forester IV, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 XT 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

9 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual
Subaru

21 reasons for Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 140 hp
The Subaru Forester IV is equipped with petrol which produce by 100 more horsepower over the the engine of the Chevrolet Trax, giving the vehicle a much more dynamic character. It seems to be better option to those who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 200 Nm
The Subaru Forester IV has 150 newton meters more torque when compared to the Chevrolet. The difference at such level is quite big, what means that the Subaru Forester IV will be seeding up significantly better.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 9.5 s
A small difference that amounts to 21 percent suggests that the Chevrolet Trax is the worst car of these two presented. In the „small off-road 4x4 class, being represented by the Chevrolet Trax, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.9 s and is by 13 percent lower than this of Chevrolet vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

505 > 356 l
With more boot size the Subaru Forester IV will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull one than the Chevrolet Trax. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will be better to buy as it is around 42 % more spacious than the boot of the Chevrolet Trax.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,579 > 786 l
33

Top speed

221 > 186 km/h
The top velocity of the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 is higher in comparison to this of the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 19 % is not big and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,795 > 1,775 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The Subaru Forester IV is widther by 20 mm compared with the Chevrolet Trax and is not really worth considering. The average for the „compact SUV” segment amounts to around 1,797 millimeters and is by 2 mm smaller than the width of the Subaru.
19

Fuel tank

61 > 51 l
In this category it is the Subaru that can carry 10 liters more fuel in relation to the Chevrolet Trax. The medium fuel container capacity in the compact SUV segment, from which the Subaru comes from, amounts to 61 liters, whereas in compact SUV segment (represented by the Chevrolet Trax) it amounts to 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,634 > 2,555 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Subaru has 3 % longer wheelbase distance than Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Subaru should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
9

Ground clearance

220 > 158 mm
Ground clearance is the minimum distance between the vehicle underbody and the road. When it comes to the two compared cars, it is the Subaru Forester IV that has 62 mm higher ground clearance in comparison to the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. For this reason the Subaru Forester IV will cope better in difficult terrain and high curbs in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ground clearance means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the vehicle.
8

Engine capacity

1,999 > 1,364 cc
The Subaru Forester IV has 47 % larger engine size in relation to the Chevrolet. The difference is relatively notable. Consequently the Subaru Forester IV should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand larger cubic capacity usually results in worst fuel efficiency.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,996 > 1,205 kg
6

Length

4,596 > 4,248 mm
The Subaru Forester IV is 348 mm longer than the Chevrolet. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will be better driven but the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,547 > 1,538 mm
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer placed inside the Subaru Forester IV is significantly better because it has smaller dimensions and creates less vibrations in relation to straight engine. Furthermore you should keep in mind that its horizontal design results in that a vehicle has a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one installed inside the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual, is that due to its simple construction it can be fuel efficient compared to other types of engines.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a travelling in the city, it is worth to have an automatic but the choice of transmisison may have a substantial effect on fuel efficiency. Automatics may consume more or less from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Payload

2,110 > 1,829 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 496 kg
0

Front track

1,545 > 1,542 mm
0

Curb weight

1,615 > 1,322 kg

Chevrolet

9 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6 > 8.3 l
The Chevrolet consumes 28 % fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4. The difference in the amount of 28 percent will be quite significant in everyday usage of the car. In the long period of time it will bring you a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

7.5 > 11.2 l
The Chevrolet Trax uses 33 percent less fuel in the city in relation to the Subaru. The difference at the level of 3.7 l will be quite significant in everyday using vehicle. Additionally, during several years it will generate real and noticeable cost savings. Also you shoule take int consideration that medium results of the average fuel consumption may be considerably increased if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles selected by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 2,400 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the highest torque is delivered tells us how fast an engine achieves its best output with growth in revolutions. The lower rotational speed or the longer range at which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt faster.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.2 > 7 l
19

Range

867 > 706 km
12

Urban range

693 > 536 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,000 > 857 km
8

Maximum load capacity

509 > 497 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 5,600 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,996 kg 1,205 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK