Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual vs Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

20 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, model available from 2005.
It has 1.6 i 16V 106HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
Chevrolet

20 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 106 hp
The Chevrolet comes with petrol which delivers by 34 more horsepower than the the engine of the Suzuki, transforming the car to a much more dynamic character. It should be googd choice to those who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
112

Average consumption

6 > 8.3 l
The Chevrolet Trax burns up 28 % less fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. The difference in the amount of 28 % will be quite very appreciable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long run it would give a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 145 Nm
Due to 55 Nm greater torque, the engine of the Chevrolet Trax does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Suzuki. This, in turn, have relevant effects on a car's acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

7.5 > 10.2 l
The Chevrolet Trax uses 27 percent less petrol running around the town in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. The difference in the amount of 2.7 l is quite appreciable in daily use of the car. Moreover, in a long term it will give you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may vary depending on how you drive
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 14.4 s
If a dynamic driving is what you realy like, the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual is better for you as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 34 % better in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV.
38

Trunk capacity

356 > 186 l
The trunk of the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual is 170 liters larger in relation to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Chevrolet Trax will be a way more convenient. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can load.
33

Top speed

186 > 160 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual is higher as compared to this of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 26 kilometers/hour is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 4,100 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is generated clearly indicates that the winner is is this of the Chevrolet. The engine of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV achieves its full efficiency at 4,100 revolutions/minute which is by 2,245 revolutions per minute worst result than the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.2 > 7 l
19

Range

867 > 671 km
12

Urban range

693 > 539 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,000 > 775 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Chevrolet has only one extra speed in relation to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. Sometimes the additional gear is a very tall one so that the previous speeds can be narrower to give better performance in the lower gears. One more gear as well helps to lower fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Maximum load capacity

509 > 425 kg
1

Model release date

2013 > 2005
Manufacture of the older vehicle commenced much more earlier than its contender thus we may expect that this car gives way to Chevrolet Trax because it has not so modern technologies .
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 5,900 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,829 > 1,828 kg
0

Front track

1,542 > 1,540 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %

Suzuki

9 reasons for Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,067 > 786 l
22

Width

1,810 > 1,775 mm
distance between left and right side of a car affects interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 is widther by 35 millimeters compared with the Chevrolet Trax and is not really relevant. The average for the „mini 4x4” class equals to approximately 1,797 millimeters and is by 1 percent smaller than the width of the Suzuki.
19

Fuel tank

55 > 51 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Suzuki that can hold 8 % more fuel in comparison to the Chevrolet Trax. The medium fuel container capacity in the compact SUV segment, which is represented by the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, is 61 l, whereas in mini 4x4 segment (represented by the Chevrolet) it is 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,636 > 2,555 mm
Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV has 81 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Engine capacity

1,587 > 1,364 cc
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV has by 16 % larger engine size when compared to the Chevrolet Trax. This may have a little impact as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,467 > 4,248 mm
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV is 5 % longer when compared to the Chevrolet. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of driving comfort and space in the boot. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV probably will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Suzuki will be better driven but the Chevrolet will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,570 > 1,538 mm
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Curb weight

1,405 > 1,322 kg

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,205 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK