Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual vs Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

14 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Suzuki SX4 II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 VVT 120HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic gearbox.

Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4
Chevrolet

14 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 120 hp
The horsepower of the Chevrolet Trax is by 17 % grater when compared to the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4. As the difference is not big it should not affect the vehicles performance to a large extent.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 156 Nm
The Chevrolet has 44 newton meters more torque in relation to the Suzuki. Although most of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when choosing a car, it informs the best how a vehicle acclerates. In this case the difference is relevant and for that reason the Chevrolet will deliver you better sensation of driving.
33

Top speed

186 > 165 km/h
The top speed of the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual is greater as compared to this of the Suzuki SX4 II which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 21 km/h is small and is imperceptible in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 4,400 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is produced distinctly indicates that the winner is is the one of the Chevrolet Trax. The engine of the Suzuki SX4 II reaches its full efficiency at 4,400 revolutions/minute which is by 2,545 revolutions/minute lower compared with the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual.
22

Width

1,775 > 1,762 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Chevrolet is 1 percent wider in comparison to the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

51 > 50 l
In this category it is the Chevrolet that can comprise 2 percent more fuel in relation to the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4. The average fuel container capacity in the small off-road 4x4 class, from which the Chevrolet Trax comes from, equals 61 liters, whereas in compact SUV class (represented by the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4) it is 61 l.
4

Rear track

1,538 > 1,505 mm
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,829 > 1,735 kg
0

Front track

1,542 > 1,538 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,322 > 1,195 kg

Suzuki

12 reasons for Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.8 > 6 l
The Suzuki SX4 II uses 0.2 l less fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Chevrolet. The Suzuki SX4 II, which is classified in „compact SUV” class uses by 1.7 l less fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 7.5 l
The Suzuki SX4 II burns 9 % fewer fuel in city traffic compared with the Chevrolet. The difference at the level of 0.7 l is quite big in use of car. Additionally, within long period of time it may generate real and noticeable cost savings. Also bear in mind that medium results of the average fuel efficiency might be considerably increased if you move dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
38

Trunk capacity

431 > 356 l
With more luggage capacity the Suzuki SX4 II will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull car than the Chevrolet Trax. If the size of the luggage compartment is appeals to you, the Suzuki will be better to choose as it is around 21 percent more spacious than the boot of its contender.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.9 > 5.2 l
19

Range

877 > 867 km
15

Wheelbase

2,595 > 2,555 mm
Suzuki SX4 II has 2 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Chevrolet. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
12

Urban range

735 > 693 km
9

Ground clearance

172 > 158 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the space between the vehicle body and the road. taking these two cars into consideration, it is the Suzuki SX4 II that has 14 mm higher ride height when compared with the Chevrolet Trax. For this reason the Suzuki SX4 II will cope better when driving over imperfect roads and obstacles in the city. One drawback is the higher ride height means a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the car.
8

Engine capacity

1,587 > 1,364 cc
The Suzuki SX4 II has 223 cc greater cubic capacity in relation to the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. Because the difference is little, the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4 should accelerate only a bit better, of course assuming that other paramerters are equal.
8

Maximum load capacity

540 > 509 kg
6

Length

4,295 > 4,248 mm
The Suzuki SX4 II is 1 % longer than the Chevrolet Trax. Long vehicles have more interior space and in most cases have plenty of trunk space. While the Suzuki SX4 II occurs to be better choice for families or drivers who love the idea of convenient rides, the Chevrolet Trax may appeal to city drivers because it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
To drivers who appreciate more functional use of a vehicle and who don’t need complications resulting from the stick shift we recommend vehicles with automatic gearbox. To those who enjoy sporting driving a stick shift may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,205 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK