Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual vs Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

15 reasons for

Chevrolet Trax, model available from 2013.
It has 1.4 140HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Suzuki SX4 II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 VVT 120HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual
Chevrolet

15 reasons for Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140KM manual in comparison to Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 120 hp
The horsepower of the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual is by 20 horsepowers grater when compared to the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. As the difference is little this should not affect the car performance in a noticeable way.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 156 Nm
Because of 44 Nm more torque, the engine of the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Suzuki SX4 II. This, in turn, have relevant effects on acceleration.
33

Top speed

186 > 180 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual is greater in comparison to of the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual by 3, which allows the Chevrolet Trax to cover quicker large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 6 kilometers per hour is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,855 > 4,400 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Chevrolet. The engine of the Suzuki SX4 II reaches its full efficiency at 4,400 revolutions/minute which is by 58 percent worst result than the Chevrolet Trax.
22

Width

1,775 > 1,762 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Chevrolet is 1 percent wider when compared to the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

51 > 50 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Chevrolet Trax which can comprise 1 l more fuel compared with the Suzuki SX4 II. The average fuel tank capacity in the mini 4x4 class, which is represented by the Chevrolet Trax, equals 61 l, whereas in mini 4x4 segment (represented by the Suzuki) it is 61 liters.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Chevrolet has a one additional gear than the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. Sometimes this extra speed is a taller one thanks to which the previous gears can be narrower in order to give increased acceleration in the lower gears. One more gear also will casuse fuel consumption and CO2 output.
4

Rear track

1,538 > 1,505 mm
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,829 > 1,735 kg
0

Front track

1,542 > 1,538 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,322 > 1,090 kg

Suzuki

12 reasons for Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 6 l
The Suzuki consumes 7 % less fuel in the mixed cycle than the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual. The Suzuki SX4 II, being palced in „small off-road 4x4” segment consumes by 1.9 l less fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 7.5 l
The Suzuki SX4 II uses 0.7 l fewer petrol in the city than the Chevrolet Trax. The Suzuki SX4 II, that comes from compact SUV segment, uses 2.8 l less gasoline. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the mini 4x4 class is 9.6 l, whereas the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual consumes by 29 % less amount of fuel than the average.
38

Trunk capacity

431 > 356 l
The Suzuki features 75 liters bigger trunk compared with the Chevrolet Trax. Such a difference is quite relevant therefore it will matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Suzuki has 3 % bigger trunk size than the average in its class. Roomy trunk will be useful during family traveling as well as while everyday car’s usage.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 5.2 l
19

Range

909 > 867 km
15

Wheelbase

2,595 > 2,555 mm
Suzuki has 2 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Chevrolet Trax. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

735 > 693 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,042 > 1,000 km
9

Ground clearance

172 > 158 mm
Ground clearance is a crucial factor in several important parameters of a vehicle. Ride height is the most important in off-road vehicles though all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Suzuki has 14 millimeters higher clearance when compared with the Chevrolet Trax. In addition to effective mobility in rough terrain, the Suzuki SX4 II will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high curbs, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,587 > 1,364 cc
The Suzuki SX4 II has by 16 percent bigger engine displacement than the Chevrolet Trax. This play a little role on vehicle's performance, as both figures does not vary much.
8

Maximum load capacity

645 > 509 kg
6

Length

4,295 > 4,248 mm
The Suzuki SX4 II is 47 millimeters longer when compared to the Chevrolet Trax. The length of the car is significant in respect of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Suzuki will be better driven but the Chevrolet Trax will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.

Cars specifications

Chevrolet Trax 1.4 140HP manual Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,205 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK