Chrysler Grand Voyager 3.8 V6 193HP automatic vs Ford Windstar I 3.0 V6 148HP manual

Chrysler Grand Voyager 3.8 V6 193HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Chrysler Grand Voyager, model available from 2010.
It has 3.8 V6 193HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Ford Windstar I, model available from 1995 to 1999.
It has 3.0 V6 148HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 1999.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Ford Windstar I 3.0 V6 148HP manual
Chrysler

12 reasons for Chrysler Grand Voyager 3.8 V6 193KM automat in comparison to Ford Windstar I 3.0 V6 148HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

193 > 148 hp
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with petrol which makes by 45 more horsepower than the Ford, transforming the car to a more dynamic character. It should be googd option for drivers who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
38

Trunk capacity

914 > 617 l
The Chrysler Grand Voyager 3.8 V6 193HP automatic features 297 liters more capable boot in relation to the Ford Windstar I 3.0 V6 148HP manual. Such a difference is significant therefore it will matters in terms of the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Chrysler Grand Voyager has 73 % bigger trunk capacity than the average in its segment. More spacious luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also during daily driving.
22

Width

1,954 > 1,915 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Chrysler Grand Voyager 3.8 V6 193HP automatic is 39 mm wider than the Ford Windstar I 3.0 V6 148HP manual. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

3,078 > 2,694 mm
The Chrysler Grand Voyager has 14 % longer wheelbase than Ford. As a result the Chrysler Grand Voyager is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

3,778 > 2,987 cc
The Chrysler Grand Voyager has 26 % bigger cubic capacity than the Ford Windstar I. The difference is relatively substantia. For this reason the Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand bigger engine size means worst fuel economy.
6

Length

5,141 > 5,121 mm
The Chrysler is 20 millimeters longer than the Ford Windstar I. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Chrysler Grand Voyager preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Chrysler Grand Voyager will be better driven ,however, the Ford Windstar I 3.0 V6 148HP manual will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,645 > 1,601 mm
1

Model release date

2010 > 1995
1

Height

1,817 > 1,789 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which is by 28 mm higher than the Ford Windstar I 3.0 V6 148HP manual, is better pick for you. However, compared cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox which is in the Chrysler Grand Voyager in spite of having a few drawback gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel the driver is more relaxed. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Front track

1,663 > 1,636 mm
0

Curb weight

2,100 > 1,815 kg

Ford

2 reasons for Ford Windstar I 3.0 V6 148KM manual in comparison to Chrysler Grand Voyager 3.8 V6 193HP automatic

Reasons for
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

4,078 > 4,070 l
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,200 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Chrysler Grand Voyager 3.8 V6 193HP automatic Ford Windstar I 3.0 V6 148HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,602 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 1995
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK