Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual vs Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual

Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Chrysler Neon II, model available from 1999 to 2003.
It has 1.6 i 16V 115HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Mazda 323 VI F, model available from 1998 to 2003.
It has 1.3 i 16V 73HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual
Chrysler

17 reasons for Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115KM manual in comparison to Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

115 > 73 hp
The Chrysler has 58 percent more horsepower compared to Mazda 323 VI F. The Chrysler Neon II will be distinctly better speed up because of bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also getting ahead of cars or obstacles while driving should be much more easier for the Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual equipped with stronger motor.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11 > 13.3 s
A little difference at the level of 2.3 s indicates that the Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual is the worst vehicle of these two compared. In the „small family cars class, being represented by the Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual, the medium acceleration is 11.3 s and is by 2 sek higher than this of Mazda vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

368 > 302 l
The Chrysler Neon II has 66 l larger luggage compartment in comparison to the Mazda 323 VI. Such a difference is quite big and it will distinctly is relevant to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Chrysler has 6 percent bigger trunk size than the average in the same class. More spacious luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also during everyday driving.
33

Top speed

185 > 164 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual is greater in comparison to of the Mazda 323 VI by 21 kilometers per hour, which allows the Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual to cover faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 13 % is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,715 > 1,705 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual is 1 percent wider in relation to the Mazda 323 VI F. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,658 > 2,603 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Chrysler Neon II has 2 % longer wheelbase distance in relation to Mazda 323 VI F. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,598 > 1,324 cc
The Chrysler Neon II has by 274 cc bigger engine capacity than the Mazda 323 VI. This play a little role in terms of acceleration, as both figures are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,390 > 4,202 mm
The Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual is 188 millimeters longer in comparison to the Mazda 323 VI F. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also have more storage space. While the Chrysler Neon II occurs to be better for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual may be more appropriate to women as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,474 > 1,470 mm
1

Model release date

1999 > 1998
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual may feature more modern technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,421 > 1,411 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 1 percent to the advantage of the Chrysler Neon II is small and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

185 > 175 mm
0

Payload

1,650 > 1,508 kg
0

Front track

1,477 > 1,470 mm
0

Tire diameter

14 > 13 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,267 > 977 kg

Mazda

6 reasons for Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73KM manual in comparison to Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

9.3 > 11.6 l
The Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual consumes of 2.3 l petrol fewer in the city in relation to the Chrysler. The Mazda 323 VI F, as a representative of compact segment, consumes of 0.6 l per 100 km more than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “compact” class equals to 8.7 l of fuel for every 100 km.
19

Fuel tank

50 > 46 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank size is Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual which is able to take by 9 percent more petrol in comparison to the Chrysler Neon II.
12

Urban range

526 > 402 km
8

Maximum load capacity

530 > 385 kg
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car generally means a hatchback and because of that the Mazda 323 VI F, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats making more room, has an advantage on the 4-door Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 5,600 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Chrysler Neon II 1.6 i 16V 115HP manual Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,650 kg 1,508 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK